Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION METING <br />Tuesday, February 16, 20 6 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Landgraver stated the draft ordinance is the framework and that the question is what the requirements <br />should be. Landgraver stated the consensus appears to be that there should be some type of licensing or <br />registration. <br />Thiesse stated he likes the registration or licensure requirements. Thiesse stated he recalls the Planning <br />Commission talking about boats and how only the owner's boat can be at the dock. <br />Barnhart stated based on tonight's discussion so far, it sounds like Items 2 through 15 could be removed, <br />with Item No. 1 being left in since some criteria is required if a license is to be revoked or not renewed. <br />Lemke stated he likes No. 9, which limits it to a minimum of two nights; requiring a 30 minute response <br />time instead of 60 minutes; and then also Nos. 8, 11, and 15. <br />Barnhart noted 15 and 4 are very similar and that he would suggest keeping Item'_ o. 4 and removing 15. <br />Lemke stated he likes the ordinance and what it is attempting to accomplish. <br />Leskinen stated she is not sure if it does any good to keep No. 2 if Item No. 1 is staying. Leskinen stated <br />it sounds like Items 1, 4, 6 8, 9, 15 are being kept in. <br />Thiesse noted Items 4 and 15 were similar and that 15 was going to be removed. <br />Barnhart stated he heard that Items 1, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 11 should remain. <br />Chair Leskinen opened the public hearing at 9:45 p.m. <br />Jim Cornick, Council Member, stated he would like some discussion on Item No. 8. Cornick suggested <br />the Planning Commission give some consideration to raising it to 21. <br />Chair Leskinen closed the public hearing at 9:46 p.m. <br />Lemke stated he likes that idea. <br />It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to raise the age of the rent to 21. <br />Page 7 of 8 <br />