My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-15-2017 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
05-15-2017 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2018 2:22:29 PM
Creation date
2/6/2018 2:21:34 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
248
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,April 17,2017 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> conditional use permit is required for grading work as well as variances for average lakeshore setback <br /> encroachment and bluff encroachment. <br /> There is an existing pool system with an extensive retaining wall system supporting it as well as some <br /> decks along the lakeside of the house. The lake is to the south of the house. The proposed work involves <br /> replacing the pool,the decks,and adding a second story deck at the southwest corner. <br /> The property is a fairly steep lakeshore lot. The house and pool, decks, and walls are tucked into the top <br /> of a slope that today is defined as a bluff. Back in 1981,the City did not have a bluff ordinance. The <br /> house was built in a location where today it would not be allowed to be constructed. All of the proposed <br /> work is more than 100 feet from the lakeshore and appears to be 75 feet from the nearest wetland. <br /> Gaffron stated the applicants will be conducting a delineation this spring to determine the exact location <br /> of the wetlands. <br /> The first issue is the average setback. In addition to the structure and grading within a bluff,the west half <br /> of the proposed reconstruction actually is encroaching the average setback line as defined by the house to <br /> the west and the house located on the lakeshore to the east. The westerly deck will encroach slightly <br /> forward lakeward than the existing deck and patio. The patio area encroachment will be approximately <br /> the same or a little less. From a view standpoint the neighboring properties should not be impacted by <br /> any additional work performed on the property. <br /> The additional encroachment of the deck and pool will be lower than the neighboring house. It is unclear <br /> at this time whether that neighbor has any objections to the second story. It should be noted that there is <br /> an apparent view easement that was established as part of the original subdivision covenants at the corner <br /> of the proposed deck. That easement is not enforceable by the City. <br /> The proposed grading within the lakeshore yard would appear to be necessary in order to match the new <br /> grades resulting from removal o the tiered retaining walls. Proposed grading plans suggest that <br /> approximately 1 to 1.5 feet of fill will be added in an area approximately 40' x 90',totaling between 500- <br /> 600 cubic yards. The existing slope in this area is in the 30-35 percent range,while the proposed slope is <br /> in the 35-40 percent range. The proposed slope will be more uniform and will smooth out some of the <br /> Page 39 of 72 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.