My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-15-2017 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
05-15-2017 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2018 2:22:29 PM
Creation date
2/6/2018 2:21:34 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
248
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,April 17,2017 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> minor variations of the existing slope. It appears that a few trees will be removed as part of the grading <br /> plan. <br /> Along the easterly yard,the tiered retaining wall system will be removed in favor of a single wall system. <br /> In this area existing slopes range from 18 percent to 36 percent. At the base of the slope is a drainageway <br /> within an existing drainage easement. Proposed re-grading after the tiered wall is removed will result in a <br /> uniform slope of about 34-36 percent. Grading plans indicate that the drainageway will not be filled or <br /> graded. A temporary culvert in the drainageway,however,is proposed to allow construction vehicle <br /> access from Long Lake Boulevard. Total fill in this area estimated by Staff is another 500 cubic yards <br /> and will range up to perhaps two feet in depth where it replaces the retaining walls. <br /> The proposed slope is at the limit of what is maintainable as yard area. The applicants should be asked <br /> what they intend for permanent ground cover in those sloped areas. Grading and filling in a bluff area is <br /> generally prohibited and the existing structures in this area would likely not be allowed under today's <br /> codes. However,their replacement substantially in kind,with only minor revisions to allow for greater <br /> safety,would appear to be reasonable and have no additional impacts on the bluff if appropriate erosion <br /> control and permanent vegetation measures are implemented. <br /> Before the Planning Commission tonight is a letter that was received from Christopher Jones. The letter <br /> talks about the fact that the applicants are seeking variances for average lakeshore setbacks,bluff setback <br /> variances,and a conditional use permit for grading. Jones states that"The proximity of this property to <br /> Long Lake and the slope o the property towards Long Lake suggests that any variance approvals be <br /> paired with rain/storm water remediation best management practices." <br /> Jones further states that"Long Lake is an impaired lake with phosphorus and other chemical levels that <br /> inhibit its ability to recover. Members of the Commission who grew up on Lake Minnetonka in the 1970s <br /> will recal what that body of water looked and felt like, and they will likely recall the 'Save The Lake' <br /> campaign that began that lake's recovery. That's where Long Lake is today,and that's without the <br /> invasive species that compound the problems. <br /> Any variances granted to this property/project also should seek commensurate rainwater runoff treatment <br /> using rainwater gardens or similar management practices to infiltrate runoff before it reaches the <br /> Page 40 of 72 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.