My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-17-2017 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
04-17-2017 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2018 10:52:12 AM
Creation date
2/6/2018 10:49:41 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
467
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,March 20,2017 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> understands their process and concerns. Fretham stated the MPCA's concern was more about the <br /> screening buffer since that is a permanent thing and that they will want to sign off on that. Fretham <br /> indicated he has hired Wenck Engineering for that component and that he can add that point to his <br /> discussions with them going into the future. <br /> Gaffron asked if the MPCA has a concern about the additional weight on the edges or the drainage being <br /> impacted. <br /> Fretham stated their concern is adding a berm on top of the landfill area,which may make it more <br /> difficult to clean the landfill up if that is found to be necessary. <br /> Leskinen asked whether the applicant would restrict the materials to just road debris or whether there <br /> would be materials from the demolition of a building if they were to be allowed to have other sites bring <br /> in their debris. <br /> Fretham stated they would like to have discretion to bring in other materials. Fretham noted on a <br /> demolition project they still have protocol they have to follow to make sure the materials that are going to <br /> be recycled are clean. Fretham stated he could provide that paperwork and that he will retain it in the <br /> event there is ever an audit performed. <br /> Leskinen asked if it would be fair to say that it could be more than just road debris. <br /> Fretham stated potentially it could be. <br /> Schoenzeit asked if he would agree to the stipulation that if other materials are brought in that it be <br /> limited to concrete,asphalt,manholes,and not this other demolition material. Schoenzeit indicated he <br /> would be very uninterested in recycling non-road material and non-authenticated stuff and turning this <br /> site back into a dump. <br /> Fretham stated they do not want to turn it back into a dump and that they consider it to be a valuable <br /> property. Fretham stated if that was a stipulation,he would need to figure out whether they could live <br /> with that. <br /> Page 22 of 64 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.