My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-17-2017 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
04-17-2017 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2018 10:52:12 AM
Creation date
2/6/2018 10:49:41 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
467
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,March 20,2017 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Thiesse stated it sounds like a site is necessary for recycling of road materials in Orono but that there is <br /> not a big need to be recycling other debris. Thiesse stated in his view the Planning Commission does not <br /> have enough information on whether that is a required component for the applicant. Thiesse commented <br /> he would love to see Orono take care of its own materials. <br /> Fretham noted he does not have control of the entire equation. <br /> Thiesse asked when that information would be available. <br /> Fretham stated it would probably be available in the next 30 to 90 days. <br /> Thiesse commented this site is probably the best site to do it, but in order to give exact information to the <br /> public on the interim use,he would like more information on how the property will be used and whether <br /> it could be viable without bringing in other materials from other towns. <br /> Schoenzeit stated the City's obligation is to keep this site clean and that it starts with knowing what the <br /> materials are and where they are coming from. <br /> Thiesse stated it also has to be a viable operation. <br /> Landgraver stated if there are limits on the amount of traffic and the type and amount of material,he <br /> would not be inclined to be as restrictive on where it is coming from. <br /> Fretham stated if the City of Mound has a road project going on and they would like to bring in 20 loads <br /> of street materials,he is hearing that might be acceptable,but if a building is being torn down in <br /> downtown Long Lake,they would like to see that go somewhere else. <br /> Schoenzeit stated he could take the concrete foundation but not the rest. <br /> Fretham stated that would be helpful since oftentimes that it what is recycled. Fretham noted there are <br /> strict specifications that they use for the recycled materials and that the finished product has to be <br /> acceptable to their standards. <br /> Page 23 of 64 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.