Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL HELD APRIL 23, 1984. PAGE 4 <br /> #804 PAINTERS CREEK Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that staff could <br /> not recommend that the City credit their land from the <br /> County Road but only consider the McCulley Road. <br /> Mabusth stated that crediting land from a County road <br /> would set a negative precedent. <br /> Councilmember Adams suggested granting a variance to <br /> the one lot rather than giving credit from McCulley <br /> Road. Adams stated that both could set a precedent. <br /> Ron Bastyr stated the total density would be 4 . 98 acres <br /> per unit. Bastyr stated that additional landscaping <br /> would be added. <br /> Councilmember Frahm stated that since the Cityforced <br /> him to great extents to meet the 5 acre requirement, <br /> why should they make an exception now. Frahm stated <br /> that they should have to meet the requirement for <br /> Outlot C too. <br /> Desyl Peterson of 4380 Chippewa Lane stated that she <br /> was in opposition to the Council crediting the <br /> McCulley Road to this land. Peterson stated that she <br /> felt that this would establish a negative precedent. <br /> Peterson stated that the developer purcr.ased the <br /> property fully aware of its limitations and purchased <br /> the property after McCulley Road was established. <br /> Peterson stated that the crediting of McCulley Road <br /> was just another way to get another buildable lot which <br /> is an economic advantage to the developer. <br /> Peter Achey of 4720 Bayside Road asked if the same <br /> setback requirements would have to be met as the 5 acre <br /> zoning district requirements. <br /> Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that with a PRD it <br /> varies . Mabusth stated that with the clustering of <br /> the houses you have different setbacks . <br /> Peter Achey of 4720 Bayside Road asked if the current <br /> substandard lots in the area would be forced to adhere <br /> to the 5 acre zoning district setbacks or do they get <br /> the same consideration as these developers. <br /> Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that unless you <br /> are invalved with a PRD, then you would be subject to <br /> the 5 acre zoning district. Mabusth stated that Mr. <br /> Achey owns a conventional lot that is just over one <br /> acre and is expected to adhere to the 5 acre setbacks. <br /> Peter Achey of 4720 Bayside Road stated that the <br /> developer is asking for a great economic benefit by <br /> asking the City to credit some of McCulley Road. <br /> Councilmember Grabek asked why the developerisgiving <br /> land to the Dunn property. <br />