02-23-1981 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

REGULAR MEETING OF THE ORO�IO COUNCIL, FEBRUARY 23 , 1981 Page 15 Alan Olson, City Planner, presented the City Council HENNEPIN COUNTY SOLID with information concerning Hennepin County ' s Solid WASTE SITE SELECTION* Waste Site Selection, and stated that Mr . Jeff Schmitt, Hennepin County, wi11 appear before the City Council on March 9 , 1981 at 8 :00 P .M. to discuss this information. Alan Olson, City Planner, presented the City Council COMPREHENSIVE PLANS* with information from Metropolitan Council concerning Minnetonka Beach, Tonka Minnetonka Beach , Tonka Bay, and Long Lake . Bay, Long Lake Alan Olson, City Planner, presented the City Council SEWAGE FLOW FORECASTS with a memo concerning the Metropolitan Council Sewage Flow Forecasts for Orono dated February 20 , 1981 . Paurus moved, Mayor Van Nest seconded, to maintain 115 gallons per day per capita sewage flow rate allowing reasonable unit designation allocation projection to 1990 . Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0 ) . Alan Olson, City Planner, reviewed with the City RECODIFICATION Council information received from Municipal Ordinance Codifiers, Inc. concerning the recodification of the City ' s ordinances. No comments from the public present. PUBLIC COMMENTS Alan Olson, City Planner, reviewed with the City SUBDIVISION Council the preliminary subdivision request of 2605 W. Lafayette Road Bruce Hepp, 2605 West Lafayette Road, dated #545 February 19 , 1981 . Bruce Hepp Mr . Jevne , attorney representing the applicant Bruce Hepp, commented on his client ' s application by stating that when considering the total building envelope size, there is 40 ' allowed for a driveway easement and 11 , 500 sq, ft. is still available for the building envelope . We feel the 11, 500 sq. ft. designates a buildable lot. Any restrictions can be recorded on a permanent record. Technical code violations have been noted. We request granting of variances if they are needed. In maintaining the character of the area, we want to address unique technical problems that were not created by Mr . Bruce Hepp. The proposed lot is still the largest in the neighborhood. Mr . Hepp 's request is reasonable . I have reviewed all findings. Variances have been allowed before, have been noted i£ required and should be reviewed and considered as par�t of our request. There is no evidence of traffic problems and staff have not documented such problems. (Continued)