Laserfiche WebLink
� ' + ' • Page 47 <br /> � METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION <br /> REGIONAL ALTERNATIVES <br /> FACT SHEET <br /> I . INTRODUCTION <br /> As part of the regionwide studies of alternative wastewater treatment systems <br /> for the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, we have assimilated the results <br /> of some nine subregional studies from which we can develop an overall regional <br /> plan for wastewater treatment. <br /> The evaluation and significant findings, including costs and staging for <br /> � implementation, will be presented for public participation at public meetings <br /> on January 22, 23, and 24. <br /> The following presents a brief surr�nary of highlights of this analysis. <br /> II. REGIONAL ALTERNATIVE THEMES <br /> To assist in the regional evaluation, the various subregional alternatives <br /> were assimilated into systemwide alternatives according to the following themes: <br /> 1 . Least Total Cost <br /> 2. Least Annual MWCC Cost <br /> 3. Minimum Environmental Impacts <br /> 4. Maximum Reliability , <br /> Treatment alternatives for each of the major components of the MWCC system, <br /> evaluated according to these themes, include: <br /> 1 . Residual Solids Management Alternatives <br /> 2. Combiried Sewer Overflow Alternatives <br /> 3. Metro Waste Treatment Plant Alternatives � <br /> 4. Alternatives for the .following Treatment Facilities: <br /> Anoka Bayport <br /> Blue Lake. Stillwater <br /> Chaska Cottage Grove <br /> Maple Plain Empire <br /> Savage Rosemount <br /> Seneca <br /> III. COST OF ALTERNATIVES <br /> Costs were developed for each of the regional alternatives including the <br /> capital and operation and maintenance costs. The capital cost portion, as <br /> listed below, assumes the alternatives are eligible for both federal and <br /> state construction grants. " <br /> OVER <br />