Laserfiche WebLink
i J <br /> , REGULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, iSARCH 30, 1978 Page 44 <br /> 4de reviewed projected cost to convert basernent, LIQUOR STORE REPORT <br /> $10, 000; cost to remodel store $60 , 000, for a total (Continued) <br /> o� $70 , 000, which does not include additional cost <br /> for inventories, increase in payroll, insurance, etc. <br /> We reviewed and projected an increase in sales of <br /> aPproximately 250 or an additional $95, 700 in <br /> sales for a total gross sales of 5478 , 400. Gross <br /> profit of 28. 16 o and a net profit of 8. 35 0. [4e <br /> used a ten year depreciation factor for the <br /> remodeling cost. Projected as a total annual <br /> expense projection. <br /> As of December 31, 1978 , $40, 000 is invested from <br /> the liquor fund, with $11, 000 cash on hand, and <br /> in light of a projected $70, 000 capital outlay <br /> cost and a $20, 000 inventory increase, it is <br /> obvious that we could not recover additional costs <br /> from the liquor fund itself and we would have to <br /> look elsewhere for additional funds. �ae also have <br /> to keep in mind that we are budgeting through our <br /> revenue forecasts $35, 000 per year for transfers to <br /> the general fund. Needless to say, �ahen reviewing <br /> operation projections, the liquor fund will not <br /> have the increase in net income needed for handling <br /> the increased cost in inventories, repayment of <br /> loans (principal and interest) and continue to <br /> transfer funds to the general fund. <br /> There is no question that the long-range net profit <br /> projection would have to increase substantially <br /> before an expansion in the liquor operation could <br /> be considered a sound business investment. <br /> Again, we held several r�eetings with staff and <br /> Dick Keaveny, owner of the present building. ���e <br /> adjusted our projected costs, or projected sales <br /> and requested the owner to pay for all structural <br /> costs to be quoted as a r.►onthly rent based upon a <br /> five-year lease. We would still have to assume <br /> some remodeling costs for the retail and storage . <br /> areas. <br /> After reviewing this arrangerient, the revised <br /> yearly costs adjusted downward approximately <br /> $2, 500 but the net profit did not change appreciatively <br /> to cause any optomistic outlook on increasing our <br /> present revenues. <br /> In view of the declining trend in net profits in <br /> the liquor business and the obvious cash require- <br /> ment to put this package together, while considering <br /> available floor space, parking space, traffic <br /> patterns, and the cost of money today, I recommend <br /> we not expand our liquor operation at this tir�e and <br /> continue to rionitor the operation as it exists in <br /> its present location. I feel that based upon our <br /> experience with the liquor operation and an apparent <br /> declining net profit with gross sales tending to increase, <br /> (Continued) <br />