Laserfiche WebLink
� . Page 46 <br /> ' Page 6 <br /> 5ay 11, 1977: The City re ceived a revised Systems Statement from the <br /> Metropolitan Council staff. The City agreed with the proposed <br /> Systems Statement with the exception that sewer service area 7 & 8 <br /> as delineated in the City' s Comprehensive Sewer Plan to be contained <br /> - in the rural service area rather than the urban service area. The <br /> City's position was that with this change for areas 7 & 8 that the � <br /> proposed Systems Statement would then be consistent with the agreement <br /> reached on 1Sarch 11, 1977. The City, again, had several meetings <br /> with the sta�f of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission and the <br /> ?4etropolitan Council discussing the exact positioning of the M.U.S.A. <br />� line. <br /> June 15, 1977: The City received a copy of the rletropolitan Council's <br /> staff review dated June 13, 1977, of the City' s Comprehensive Sewer <br /> Plan. The review .recommenc3ed moving the Pd.U.S.A. line as well as <br /> the designated sewer service area of the Orono-Long Lake interceptor <br /> to be consistent with the City's comprehensive planning. The City <br /> felt that this review was i�_ complete agreement with our meeting of <br /> March 11 as well as being consistent with the City' s Comprehensive <br /> Sewer Plan and its Comprehensive Land Use Plan. <br /> June 16, 1977: The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission drafted a memo <br /> to the 24etropolitan Council objecting to changing the aesignated <br /> sewer service area of the Orono-Long Lake interceptor from w�at was <br /> originally aesignated as early as 1971. Even though the population <br /> projections for Orono had been reduced from in excess of 35, 000 to <br /> approxinately 11, 000 and the interceptor had been redesigned to <br /> serve a much snaller area as weil as much smaller flows, tl�e Waste <br />