Laserfiche WebLink
I . Page 47 <br /> . Page 7 <br /> Control Commission felt that the designated sewer service area should <br /> contain vast areas of Orono to which the interceptor would not be <br /> sized to serve_ It see�ed that the primary concern here was the <br /> payment of reserve capacity that was built into the r5etro system <br /> based on earlier projections of 35, 000 people �rom the City of Orono. <br /> June 23, 1977: The City received a drastically revised Systems Statemeni <br /> adopted without the knowledge of the City that removed the recom- <br /> mendation to change the designated sewer service area of the intercepi <br /> as well as any changes to. the M.U.S.A, line within Orono. This <br /> Systems Statement is totally unexceptable to the City and it negates <br /> • all the negotiations that the City has held with the Metropolian <br /> Council staff since 1974. <br /> June 24, 1977: A letter sent from the Metropolitan Council informing <br /> us that the physicial development cor.unittee has delayed action on our <br /> Comprehensive Sewer Plan review and rescheduling an appearance for <br /> _ some later date. This later date was further cancelled and we heard <br /> nothing from ?3etropolitan Council until Septer.►ber of 1977. <br /> Septenber 8, 1977: The City received Addendum 2 to the Engineering Report <br /> for the Orono-Long Lake interceptor. The addendum contained addition� <br /> flows and a designated sewer service area the same as the original <br /> area established in 1971_ This addendum even included flows and <br /> designated sewer service area that was removed by the Metropolitan <br /> Council itself in action in August of 1976. This addendum was not <br /> in accordance with the agreer,ient reached on March 11, 1977. <br />