Laserfiche WebLink
REGUL�R i�EFTING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, FEBRUARY 23, 1978 Page 19 <br /> Side Yard Rear Yard Side Yard SUBVIDISION <br /> 10 feet 30 feet Adjacent to 3024 Casco Point Road <br /> Street (Continued) <br /> 15 feet � <br /> Definition: Lot 4�idth. The maximum horizontal <br /> distance between the side lot lines of a lot <br /> measured parallel to the front lot line and at <br /> the rear of the required front yard. <br /> Mr. Bruce Malkerson also noted that the Supreme ' <br /> Court has determined that a front lot line is on <br /> the lakeside, not the street side. <br /> This application is subrnitted by Mr. Braun, but <br /> P�r. Singer representing Mr. Braun, has indicated <br /> that AZr. Braun does not want anything to do with <br /> this, if that is the case, Mr. Plowman should . <br /> subnit an appliation. <br /> Councilmember P4assengale: This application is <br /> three years old and the applicants cannot agree. <br /> It appears that we can only rehash old data when <br /> the applicant is not fulfilling requirements. <br /> P�ir. Schnell: In view of the facts before us, I <br /> believe the Council should approve this application <br /> and allow my client to proceed with haste to <br /> compete requirements. <br /> Mayor Van Nest: I feel that we should support the <br /> Planning Commission' s findings and recor.unendations, <br /> we have to consider all aspects. It appears that <br /> variances are required which have not been applied <br /> for. - <br /> I�Iayor Van Nest moved, Massengale seconded, to instruct <br /> staff to prepare a resolution incorporating all findings <br /> of facts and Planning Coinmission recommendations to <br /> deny and submit at the March 16, 1978 Council meeting. <br /> Discussion followed. <br /> Bruce Malkerson to Mr. Braun: Do you want to with- <br /> draw your application? <br /> Mr. Braun: No. <br /> Mr. Alan Olson commented that a resolution had never <br /> been drafted nor signed because conditions had never <br /> been rnet. <br /> Councilmember Butler: I believe we should move to <br /> reconsider previous rnotion of October or November, l977. <br /> Discussion ended. <br /> The above seconded motion was voted on. riotion, Ayes (4) - <br /> Tlavs (0) . C�uncilme*nber neselc abstained. <br />