02-23-1978 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

REC;ULAR T4EETIP�G OF THE OROPdO COUNCIL, FEBRUARY 23 , 1978 Page 20 Mr. Alan Olson, Assistant Building & Zoning SUBDIVISION & REZONING Administrator, entered into the record the 2060 �ayzata Boulevard following information concerning a request for #308 a subdivision and rezoning for Sidney Rebers, Sidney_ Rebers 2060 �aayzata Boulevard, dated September 13, 1977, which states : This application is an initial subdivision of this property into three parcels, two of which are in the B-1 Cor:unercial District and the remaining parcel in RR-1B residential district. Each parcel meets the area and width requirements of the respective zones. There are no wetlands on this property. Access is to State Highway #12 and to Brown Road North. There has been no indicated use of Lot 1 to date. RR-1B requires 2 acres , 200 ft. width Outlot A contains 32 acres , 1,100 ft. width ' B-1 requires 20, 000 sq. ft. , 100 ft. width Lot 1 contains 45, 838 sq. ft. , 149 ft. width Outlot B contains 312 , 500 sq. ft. , 745 ft, width The rezoning is requested to realign the zoning district boundary consistent with the lot con- figuration as it exists. It would also affect line as it passes through the Wear parcel. The district line would move north 60 ft, as proposed. A public hearing for the subdivision and rezoning has been scheduled for October 8, 1977 at 8: 00 P.M. Septenber 30, 1977 Fiank P'Iuhich memo I reviewed the proposal and packet as previously prepared and distributed by Alan Olson. I discovered that a copy of the plat map section was missing. I am enclosing a copy of the plat map with this memo as we do on all such proposals. In checking the plat map, some interesting questions c� to my attention. Note the dotted line indicated by the arrow on the copy of the plat map. I have not had the time to review exactly what this dotted line might indicate, but we might request the applicant submit some data to clarify the status of all this property. I am sure the status will be cleared when the title opinion is reviewed by our attorney, but it would probably be less expensive and less tir_le consuming now rather than after pre- liminary approval. I have not heard anything from the State Hic�hway Depart- ment regarding this proposal. I do not know whether Alan Olson has sent them a copy Lo review. The State Iiighway Department should be consulted. They might be interested in additional right of way. We might also consider easements for service roads or other access alternatives. (Continued)