Laserfiche WebLink
� � , <br /> MINUTES OF A COUNCIL MEETING HELD DECEMBER 4 , 1974 Page 7 <br /> � , <br /> � Since area A is outside of any sewer system <br /> �forseen for the future, it only makes sense <br /> that this area be classified as 5 acres so <br /> � that the danger of pollution to the water <br /> shed and to the ground water supply will be <br /> � eliminated. There was no doubt in their minds <br /> � that the consideration of public welfare <br /> required the change from 1 acre to 5 acre lot <br /> � designations. If the village rezoned the <br /> area from 1 to 2 acres and if the 2 acre site <br /> � proved to be inadequate, then the village <br /> would never be able to rectify that problem <br /> � by extending sewer to that area. In addition, <br /> the extension of a sewer to that area would be <br /> � prohibited because of extreme expense and <br /> • damage to the environment. The Metropolitan <br /> Council �uggests that 5 acres be used for <br /> i areas such as area A. It was noted that the <br /> community seminars that were held in 1972 <br /> � indicated that the people in the area also <br /> wanted the 5 acre designation. Moreover, an <br /> � analysis of the soil types in that area reveal <br /> that 5 acres would be necessary to preserve <br /> � the ground water supply from pollution from <br /> � on-site sanitary sewer disposal systems. Mayor <br /> Searles noted that in addition to the rezoning, <br /> � new sewer septic system regulations for on-site <br /> �disposal will be necessary. It was noted that <br /> the proposed amendment will allow for the con- <br /> tinuation of the uses and life styles presently <br /> � located in area A. It was noted that if the <br /> area were allowed to stay as 1 acre or even <br /> � as 2 acres, then municipal sewer would �ave to <br /> • be extended to that area in order to protect <br /> the citizens of Orono. If such an extension <br /> � were allowed or even possible, the way of <br /> life style would change immensely and the owners <br /> � in that area wvuld be forced to sell their <br /> farms in order to pay for the sewer assessment. <br /> � Moreover, if it stayed as a 1 acre area, the <br /> intense development which would occur on 1 <br /> � acre would result in the destruction of the wet <br /> • lands because of the poor storm water run-off. <br /> It was noted that the amendment would stop the <br /> * dense development from encroaching further into <br /> this rural residential zone. It was noted that <br /> � if allowed to stay at 1 acre, the area might <br /> later be developed in scattered subdivisions <br /> � which would necessitate the development of major <br /> roads and sewer systems to service that far <br /> ` corner of the village. The present road network <br /> . can barely service the development that is there <br /> �today. The traffic studies done by the village <br /> � <br /> � <br /> � <br />