Laserfiche WebLink
' <br /> July 24, 2002 Page 3 <br />� Hollander Residence Limited Structural Evaluation. <br /> MGI Commission#02162 <br /> for Mr. John Hollander <br /> tREPAIRS DEFINED WITHIN THE CITY'S RESOLUTION WITH RESPONSES, continued: <br />' City: "Provide code compliant egress window." <br /> Response: 1. Egress windows are not required by code at these foundation walls. <br /> 2. The existing window wells shall be cleared of debris. This includes the tree truck growing in one of <br /> them. <br />� 3. The existing windows shall be cleaned and either repaired or replaced so as to not permit <br /> access into the basement area by insects or animals. <br /> 4. A clear plexiglass cover shall be provided over the top of the window wells to restrict acess of <br />' insects, animals and accidental falls into the window well. The cover shall be sealed all around with <br /> caulking compound and mechanically anchored to the window well concrete, with anchors that will <br /> permit the future removal for cleaning and maintenance of the window well area. <br />' Floor Svstem <br /> City: "Replace floor system with code compliant materials a minimum of 18"from earth." <br />' Response: 1. Only a few areas need to be repaired due to some splitting/cracking of the members&/or <br /> connections. <br /> 2. The structure has been there in its current state for many years prior to many of the current building <br /> codes and code requirements. To require that the floor framing be changed now, to become <br />� compliant with current building codes is excessively restricting and borders on excessive restrictive <br /> code compliance. If it is allowed to be applied here, for this project, in broad generalized terms <br /> (replace the floor system), rather than individual specific bad members or connection, we are at risk <br />, of setting a very serious precident that may affect many other homeowners. <br /> 3. We are recommending at this time that individual members be supported by additional framing <br /> down to the floor slab/foundations at the chimney area and at the beam adjacent to the basement <br /> stair opening. This additional framing at the chimney would consist of steel adjustable screw jacks <br />� under the severed existing framing. The tops of the jacks shall be nailed to the existing framing <br /> members with a minimum of four 16d nails per jack. The bottom of the screw jacks shall be <br /> anchored to the concrete slab on grade with concrete anchors, Tapcon type screws or equal. This <br /> area will be inspected by the engineer of record for the project at the time of installation and upon <br />, completion of the installation. Similar framing shall be provided for the severed beam adjacent to <br /> the basement stair opening. Additional screw jacks shall be provided beneath the beam. A new <br /> additional double 2x8 treated beam members shall be fastened to each side of the existing severed <br />' beam and fastened to the screw jacks also. <br /> 4. The existing system appears to have worked well for many years. It would be very unfortunate to <br /> totally replace the existing floor system, unfortunate not only for the unnecessary costs, but also for <br /> the loss of historical framing systems. <br />, 5. The intent with the floor system shall be to reinforce only those areas that are needed without <br /> significantly changing the existing framing (due to historical preservation goals)or the existing load <br /> path of the structure. <br /> t 6. Additional observation will occur by the engineer of record during the course of repairs. Additional <br /> framing repairs may be identified at that time. A final evaluation and report shall be provided upon <br /> completion of the framing repairs. <br /> 7. Wherever reasonably accessible, areas where existing framing comes into contact with the soils, <br />' shall have the soil removed and a treated 2x member placed between the existing framing and the <br /> soil. <br />' <br />' continued on next page,,,,, <br />' <br />