Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> SPECIAL ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday, January 6,2014 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (1. #13-3638 and#13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LLC(PAT HILLER) O/B/O GRANT <br /> WENKSTERI�'(LAKEVIEW GOLF), 405 NORTH ARM DRIVE—COMPREHEI�'SIVE <br /> PLANAMENDMENTANDSKETCHPLANREVIEW, Continucd) <br /> The principal question on the sketch plan is whether the Council supports the use of an RPUD approach <br /> or two-acre lots. The question for the applicants is the type of development that will then result based on <br /> that density. The first alternative plan,which was considered by the Planning Commission, utilized an <br /> RPUD approach with provided access to a central road from which several short spurs extended to <br /> clusters of one-acre lots. The primary feature of that design was retention of just under half of the gross <br /> land area as common open space. Grittman stated while the Planning Commission gave an informal <br /> endorsement to this idea,the City Council was less favorable and preferred two-acre zoning. <br /> Grittman noted the sketch plan review is basically advising the applicant on the general direction the City <br /> would like the development to follow. Under a standard plat arrangement,the applicant would be <br /> required to design a project that has the minimum width and lot area for each lot of public streets. <br /> Levang thanked Grittman for the clarification of the two-acre averaging that is being proposed under the <br /> revised sketch plan. <br /> McMillan noted historically Lakeview Golf Course has been located in the City's two-acre zoning <br /> district. McMillan asked whether other cities, when there is a difference between their zoning districts <br /> and guidance under the Comprehensive Plan, whether they immediately go to the task of reconciling all <br /> of those differences. <br /> Grittman indicated the requirements of the Metropolitan Council's are to bring the City's official controls <br /> into compliance with the Comprehensive Plan within nine months but that it is not a concrete deadline <br /> enforced by the Metropolitan Council. Grittman indicated in this particular case,the guidance and the <br /> land use or the zoning designation, given the historic use of the property, are consistent since golf courses <br /> are allowed in the rural residential district and there are not necessarily any conflicts. <br /> McMillan asked if it would be a separate process for reconciling those differences and whether the <br /> property owners would be provided notice that their property may be re-guided. <br /> Grittman stated if the City goes through the Comprehensive Plan process and decides to take an area and <br /> designate it for a different land use designation than what the previous plan called for,that would be part <br /> of the Comprehensive Plan public process. The City is not required to notice individual property owners; <br /> although, some cities will do that if major changes are being proposed. Grittman stated at the zoning <br /> stage, the City is generally required to individually notify any affected property, which would be similar <br /> to any other zoning application. <br /> McMillan asked if more detail is required when the City is changing the zoning ordinance and less detail <br /> if they are chan,ing Comprehensive Plan guidance. <br /> Grittman stated it would be a more administrative or technical process on the zoning side and more of a <br /> policy process on the Comprehensive Plan side. <br /> Page 3 of 27 <br />