Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> SPECIAL ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,January 6,2014 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (1. #13-3638 and#13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITtIL, LLC(PAT HILLER) O/B/O GRANT <br /> WENKSTERN(LAKEVIEW GOLF), 40�NORTH ARM DRIVE—COMPREHEl�'SIVE <br /> PLANAMENDMENTANDSKETCHPLANREVIEW, Continued) <br /> Grittman noted the primary issues resulting from a denial and/or approval would be legal and budgetary <br /> issues but that it is not impossible to read the Comprehensive Plan to say that it is best to leave it as open <br /> space. A yes vote to the applicant's proposal would re-guide the property from its current open space <br /> designation to rural residential and there are potential issues that would flow from that. <br /> Grittman indicated the nature of development under this scenario is still uncertain at this point. The <br /> applicants have proposed a series of sketch plans, and noted that the City Council,by simply changing the <br /> land use designation, does not lock the City into any specific plat or development plan. The rural <br /> residential designation is consistent with the existing zoning and there are several policies in the <br /> Comprehensive Plan that would sustain this land use designation. Grittman stated the issues are primarily <br /> based around issues relating to compatibility with the existing land use pattern in the area. <br /> Grittman stated the final issue before the City Council would be development and design and what type of <br /> development would result with a rural residential designation. Grittman stated the different land use <br /> designations for the community have a number of aspects to them that are written in the Comprehensive <br /> Plan. Grittman indicated if there is an approval,the Comprehensive Plan amendment would then be <br /> submitted to the Metropolitan Council. The Metropolitan Council would then be obligated to make a <br /> determination as to whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the regional planning documents <br /> within its areas of jurisdiction. <br /> Staff recommends approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment and believes it is consistent with <br /> existing zoning in the area. Grittman indicated the rural residential land use designation would <br /> accommodate residential land use with two-acre lot zoning, which is consistent with this zoning district. <br /> Grittman stated the City would avoid certain legal or budgetary uncertainties if this approach is taken. <br /> The two-acre residential development would be consistent with the surrounding area, which Staff feels is <br /> one of the strongest factors supporting this particular amendment proposal. In addition,the City's <br /> platting requirements ensure that the area will be protected from environmental threats,traffic problems, <br /> or engineering concerns. Grittman stated many of the other technical concerns that flow out of a <br /> development proposal on land such as this would be really very well managed by the City's development <br /> regulations, such as its subdivision regulations and environmental regulations. As a result, Staff is <br /> confident that development on this property would not raise a threat to the environment, which is also a <br /> supporting factor of the idea that a change to the land use plan can be made in that regard. <br /> Following the decision on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment by the City Council, a discussion will be � <br /> had on the sketch plan proposed by the applicant. The applicants have submitted a second alternative <br /> sketch plan for review in addition to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Grittman noted the <br /> applicant's revised sketch plan does rely on some Planned Residential Development by varying lot sizes <br /> but does not provide the large open space component that was part of the ori�inal sketch plan. <br /> In support of the revised sketch plan, the applicants have taken a series of soil borings and percolation <br /> tests, prepared a generalized stormwater management plan, conferred with Hennepin County in relation to <br /> road design and access, conferred with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District regarding stormwater <br /> management, and addressed the directives of the City's Conservation Design principles. <br /> Page 2 of 27 <br />