My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-27-2014 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
01-27-2014 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2015 4:44:55 PM
Creation date
4/6/2015 1:13:23 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
369
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> SPECIAL ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,January 6,2014 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (I. #13-3638 and#13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL,LLC(PAT HILLER) D/B/O GRANT <br /> WENKSTERN(LAKEVIEW GOLF), 405 NORTH ARM DRIVE— COMPXEHEl�'SIVE <br /> PLA1V AMENDMENT AND SKETCH PLAN REVIEW, Continued) <br /> Printup noted the City's Comprehensive Plan came about in the mid-1970s, and that he is strubgling with <br /> the stren�h of the Comprehensive Plan versus the land use and zoning of properties. Printup noted that <br /> reconciling those two appears to be causing a number of people some issues. <br /> Gaffron stated the zoning of Orono did not start until 1950. In November of 1950, the area where <br /> Lakeview exists was zoned the Forest Lake District, which required a 15,000 square foot minimum lot <br /> size and a 75-foot lot width. Over the next 10 years,the City required that all new developments have <br /> larger lot areas and lot widths. In 1960, the requirements for the majority of the City became one acre lots <br /> with a 140-foot lot width. In 1967,the City rezoned large portions of Orono, with roughly the northwest <br /> half of the City being zoned R-1C,which consisted of single-family, one-acre minimum lot sizes and <br /> 145-foot lot widths. That zoning was changed again in 1975 to RR-1B, which is the City's typical rural <br /> residential two-acre minimum. That two acre zoning exists today. <br /> Gaffron stated in terms of the City's Comprehensive Plan,the first plan was adopted�in 1974, and shows <br /> lakeshore residential lot for the southeasterly three-quarters of the properties and rural residential for the <br /> northwesterly three-quarters of the properties. That 1974 plan also indicated recreation facilities of <br /> metropolitan significance. Gaffron stated his assumption is that it means a recreation area that drew more <br /> than just the local residents, such as the different golf courses. <br /> In 1980,the City adopted a new Comprehensive Plan. The land use plan showed various areas as park <br /> and recreation areas, including all public and privately owned golf courses. In the 2000-2020 <br /> Comprehensive Plan, it listed a category for park, recreation and open space. The City's 2008-2030 <br /> Comprehensive Plan had the same designation. Gaffron stated the City's Comprehensive Plans over the <br /> years contained zoning that allowed residential development as early as 1950 and it has been zoned <br /> residential ever since. Gaffron noted the City did not have a guide plan until 1974,but that guide plan has <br /> always shown this property as a park and recreation area. <br /> Anderson asked if a different type of weighting was aiven in 1995 to the primary land controls in the <br /> Comprehensive Plan versus the City's zoning ordinances. <br /> Gaffron stated she is probably talking about the Comprehensive Plan versus zoning and the hierarchy of <br /> one over the other. <br /> Mattick stated there was some discussion back then about which takes priarity-the Comprehensive Plan <br /> or the City's zoning to the extent they are inconsistent. Mattick stated in some of the materials that have <br /> been submitted tonight, it suggests that the Comprehensive Plan controls. Mattick stated in his view the <br /> history of the City's Comprehensive Plans is important,but in terms of the hierarchy and which one <br /> controls, that does not really matter at this point. Mattick stated in his opinion, based on the MN Supreme <br /> Court and the state statutes, it is more important for the City to get them in alignment with each other. <br /> Mattick stated whether that is accomplished by changing the Comprehensive Plan ar zoninb ordinances <br /> does not matter but that they need to be consistent. <br /> Page 4 of 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.