Laserfiche WebLink
. - Mr. Jesse Struve, PE <br /> • � January 6, 2014 <br /> � Page 3 <br /> • Minimum input on design details and or products used by contractor. (Example: <br /> Two coat epoxy is minimum system allowed by AWWA. For a small increase, a <br /> three coat system can be applied to provide additional protection.) <br /> • Schedule per contractor <br /> • System designed to meet contract life <br /> Benefits-Drawbacks of DesiEn-Bid-Build <br /> Benefits <br /> • Lower compared cost(Example: $407,900 - 5 year cost including 2 year floatdown <br /> inspection, one power wash and cleanout, one visit for spot repairs—likely not <br /> required; $456,400- 10 year cost including two floatdown inspections, two power <br /> wash and cleanout, two visits for spot repairs—likely not required) <br /> • Project schedule predetermined <br /> • Only necessary work is completed <br /> • Specific design details and construction materials are specified so owner knows <br /> exactly what will be provided <br /> • Engineer provides inspection on the work as requested by the owner(Full Time vs. <br /> Part Time inspection) <br /> Drawbacks <br /> • Contractor unknown until after bids are opened <br /> • Owner may be required to contract for future wark(inspections, power washing, <br /> repairs, etc.) <br /> Cost Comparison <br /> Warranty Period SEH�DB Delivery Traditional DBB BMI Projected Savings <br /> Method Delivery Method <br /> 5 Year $466,700 $407,900 $58,800 <br /> 10 Year $548.800 $456,400 �92,400 <br /> By using the traditional DBB method, the City can include a higher level of protection with a three coat <br /> epoxy system on the interior wet portion of the tank for cost savings of$58,800 for a 5 year warranty and <br /> $92,400 for a 10 year warranty. <br /> Conclusions and Recommendations <br /> � Based on the two delivery methods, we recommend the City complete the project using the traditional <br /> DBB method for the following reasons: <br /> 1. Value. By publicly bidding the work, competitive bidding is increased and the owner is afforded <br /> the market rate for the work. The same contractor that is proposing to do the work by the DB <br /> method can be awarded the work for a lower price because of more bidding competition. <br /> 2. Only complete work necessary. Inspections or repairs of the coating system are not needed per <br /> the frequency included in the SEH�DB proposal. Often, inspections are held at the two year <br /> warranty period and then every five years thereafter. Spot repairs can be completed at the five <br /> G:\Orono\010614 struvememo.dotx <br /> You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer(http://www.novapdf.com) <br />