My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-23-2015 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2015
>
02-23-2015 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2015 10:47:02 AM
Creation date
3/12/2015 10:46:41 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 23, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 4 of 19 <br /> <br />3. #15-3707 – AMEND SECTION 78-1405(a)(5) CLARIFY RETAINING WALL AND <br />LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE SETBACKS – ORDINANCE NO. 139 (continued) <br /> <br />Gaffron stated until this piece of the code was misinterpreted last summer; it has not been an issue. <br />Gaffron stated the City in the past has defined a retaining wall and the City Code scarcely addresses them. <br />Gaffron stated this issue may have grown into something bigger than it needs to be, but that the City <br />Council should go through some of the potential changes that can be made to the Code. <br /> <br />One of the issues that have been discussed previously is the proximity of planter boxes and retaining <br />walls to the property lines. Council suggested at the last meeting that a planter box up to two feet high <br />and involving up to 20 cubic yards of fill be allowed as close as two to three feet from the side or rear lot <br />line without a permit. Staff would be comfortable with allowing a 2-foot high wall or planter bed <br />involving ten cubic yards as close as five feet from the lot line without a permit, but that in situations <br />where there is less than a 5-foot setback, the wall is higher than two feet, and more than ten cubic yards of <br />fill are involved, there should be an administrative permit. <br /> <br />Staff’s reluctance to allow for less than a 5-foot setback without at least an administrative permit is that <br />on narrow lots drainage can be a concern. Staff feels retaining walls and planter boxes need to be located <br />and designed so as not to impede drainage between and across adjoining properties. In addition, while <br />maintenance, safety, and visual impacts are less of an issue, they should be reviewed. Staff would also <br />recommend that any wall or planter box to be located less than five feet from a property line or less than <br />ten feet from the traveled roadway require an administrative permit to ensure review of the drainage and <br />other potential neighborhood impacts and to determine whether a conditional use permit should be <br />required. <br /> <br />Another factor to consider is whether the retaining wall or planter box would be located in the shoreland. <br />Gaffron stated shoreland regulations are pretty much the same in all cities and basically state that without <br />a permit, someone is allowed up to 10 cubic yards on a steep slope or within the bluff impact zones <br />without a permit and up to 50 cubic yards would be allowed outside of steep slopes or bluff impact zones. <br />Gaffron noted Orono’s current code requires a permit to for that. <br /> <br />In addition, current City Code functionally prohibits any amount of filling or earth movement without a <br />conditional use permit. There is an exception to the conditional use permit requirement for earth <br />movement of less than 500 cubic yards which does not adversely impact existing drainage, but this still <br />requires a land alteration permit for such activity. Gaffron stated if up to 10 cubic yards is going to be <br />allowed to be placed for low walls or planter beds without a permit, and then it follows than 10 cubic <br />yards of fill should be allowed without a permit anywhere in Orono. Gaffron stated in order to make this <br />code change, the City will need to publish and hold a public hearing as this change was not anticipated or <br />published as part of the original retaining wall as a non-encroachment proposed amendment. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated in regards to encroachments within road right-of-ways, this is addressed to a great extent <br />already in the City’s Code. Currently the public road is considered by definition the public property <br />between lateral lot lines, and when the street is not platted, includes ten feet either side of the actual paved <br />or traveled roadway surface. City Code currently requires a permit for placement of any obstructions <br />within a street.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.