Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 27, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />Page 4 of 32  <br />  <br />(4. #13-3636 LIXIAO WANG, 3059 FARVIEW LANE – VARIANCES, Continued) <br /> <br />Levang stated the Planning Commission reviewed the plan again and voted 4-2 in favor of the 6-foot <br />garage. Levang stated she would like the applicant to have a functional two-car garage but that she is not <br />in favor of granting a variance simply to allow a three-car garage. Levang stated the City Council should <br />set some sort of minimum, which would be 24 feet. <br /> <br />Printup stated his concern with that is that anyone who has a 23-foot garage would come in and request a <br />24-foot garage. Printup stated the problem he has with the application is that it appears to be benign <br />because they are only talking about a few feet, but that it becomes a slippery slope and could cause <br />problems down the road. Printup stated he is hesitant about setting a standard since there really is no <br />standard. <br /> <br />Levang stated if the garage is 23 feet and they would like 24 feet, they could move the interior wall if it is <br />structurally possible. <br /> <br />Wang indicated the Planning Commission stated cars could also be parked outside, which would block <br />the view somewhat, and that they are looking to park a small car in that third stall. <br /> <br />Levang stated the City Council understands that point, and that the City Council decides whether or not to <br />accept the recommendation of the Planning Commission. Levang stated the City Council is interested in <br />making sure the applicant has a functional two-car garage. <br /> <br />McMillan noted the Planning Commission was going off that 18-foot depth, and if the depth is truly 23 <br />feet, the Planning Commission may have recommended otherwise. McMillan stated a motion could be <br />made conditional upon verification of the depth. <br /> <br />Printup asked if the true depth is 23 feet, whether he could expand it one foot. <br /> <br />McMillan stated if it is 23 feet, she would not allow it to be expanded at all. <br /> <br />Levang stated if it is 18 feet, the City Council would allow him to go to 24 feet. <br /> <br />McMillan noted the application would need to come back to the City Council again in order to approve <br />the resolution, which would allow Staff time to verify the depth of the garage. McMillan stated if the <br />depth is determined to be 23 feet, the application would be denied. <br /> <br />Wang stated at the last Planning Commission meeting, those numbers were not on there. <br /> <br />Levang noted the City Council needs to have that number verified. <br /> <br />Wang indicated that is fine. <br /> <br />McMillan stated the Planning Commission was going off a depth of 18 feet. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />