My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-27-2014 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
01-27-2014 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2015 1:59:07 PM
Creation date
3/5/2015 1:58:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 27, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 5 of 32 <br /> <br />(4. #13-3636 LIXIAO WANG, 3059 FARVIEW LANE – VARIANCES, Continued) <br /> <br />Mattick stated given the time constraints, the resolution will need to be adopted at the next City Council <br />meeting, and asked what the exact parameters of an approval would be and what the parameters of a <br />denial would be. <br /> <br />Levang stated if the garage depth is 23 feet, the City Council will deny the variance, and if the garage is <br />less than 23 feet, the City Council will approve the variance and allow the garage addition up to 24 feet. <br /> <br />McMillan stated if the garage is 18 feet deep, the City Council will follow the Planning Commission <br />recommendation. <br /> <br />Levang noted the Planning Commission recommended the deck not be permitted and also recommended <br />any additional requests for hardcover to the driveway not be allowed. <br /> <br />Mattick asked whether it is 18 feet in depth or less than 23 feet in depth. Mattick stated he would like to <br />make sure that if the depth is somewhere in between those two numbers, that the motion would cover that. <br /> <br />Printup stated he agrees with half of the potential motion, but that he has an issue with the part that says if <br />it 23 feet or less. <br /> <br />Levang stated they are saying he should have a functional garage and the standard is 24 feet. If it is 18 <br />feet deep, the garage is not functional. <br /> <br />Printup asked when the house and garage were originally constructed. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated 1979. <br /> <br />Printup commented between 1979 and now, the garage was functional. <br /> <br />Levang noted the interior wall was potentially moved. <br /> <br />Curtis stated the elevator was added to that third stall in 2001. <br /> <br />McMillan stated 20 feet tends to be the minimum depth of a garage nowadays. McMillan noted the City <br />Council has a 23-foot depth from 2001 and an 18-foot depth from the builder for this application and that <br />the City Council is attempting to figure out which number is correct. <br /> <br />McMillan stated if the garage is substandard, then getting it to a standard, functional depth is what she is <br />concerned about. McMillan stated the garage appeared to be functional in 2001 and that she is less <br />concerned about the third stall because the focus by the Planning Commission and the City Council has <br />been that the main two-car garage is functional. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.