My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-27-2014 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
01-27-2014 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2015 1:59:07 PM
Creation date
3/5/2015 1:58:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 27, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 3 of 32 <br /> <br />(4. #13-3636 LIXIAO WANG, 3059 FARVIEW LANE – VARIANCES, Continued) <br /> <br />Wang stated the previous owner added the elevator, which eliminated the ability to park a car in that area. <br /> <br />Wang indicated the mechanical equipment is located behind the double doors. <br /> <br />Curtis stated this is the 2001 plan that was submitted as part of the application for the elevator installation <br />and it shows 23 feet from the front of the garage to the back of the garage where the double doors are. <br />The applicant’s current plan from his builder depicts an 18-foot depth which Staff has not been able to <br />reconcile. <br /> <br />Wang stated he called his builder prior to the meeting but he indicated he is unable to attend tonight’s <br />meeting due to an illness in the family. The builder also indicated that he would be willing to answer any <br />questions the City Council had when he returned. <br /> <br />Wang stated he would like a three-car garage so they can park their daughter’s car inside. Wang noted he <br />was not aware of the difference in the plans and that he has just recently purchased the property. Wang <br />stated due to the elevator, in order to park a vehicle in that area, they need to expand the area. Wang <br />stated the addition had to be added to the entire garage to preserve the integrity of the garage. <br /> <br />Levang asked if Staff can verify that the depth is 18 feet. <br /> <br />Curtis stated the 18 feet is shown on the builder’s plans, which Staff assumes is correct. <br /> <br />Levang asked if the applicant is requesting the 6-foot extension from the 18 feet. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated that is correct. <br /> <br />McMillan noted there is also another plan that depicts it as 23 feet deep, which is what is confusing. <br /> <br />Curtis stated Staff could inspect the garage and verify the depth. <br /> <br />McMillan stated she would like the applicant to have a functional two-car garage, which is basically 20’ x <br />24’. McMillan stated she is not in favor of a variance to simply allow a three-car garage. McMillan <br />stated she has a concern with what the actual depth of the garage is, which will need to be confirmed. <br /> <br />Wang indicated Staff put those numbers on there. <br /> <br />Curtis stated those numbers were determined based on the scale of the plan. <br /> <br />Wang indicated he was not present when the builder drew up his plans. <br /> <br />McMillan stated the applicant had indicated at a previous meeting that he was unable to fit a Suburban or <br />similar sized car in the two stalls and that the depth of the garage needs to be verified. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.