Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 27, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />Page 2 of 32  <br />  <br /> <br />PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT <br /> <br />4. #13-3636 LIXIAO WANG, 3059 FARVIEW LANE – VARIANCES <br /> <br />Lixiao Wang, Applicant, was present. <br /> <br />Curtis noted this application first appeared before the Planning Commissions in October where the <br />applicant proposed a 12-foot garage addition. The Planning Commission at that time tabled the <br />application and recommended the addition be reduced to six feet. At the November Planning <br />Commission meeting, the applicant proposed a 9-foot addition, which was subsequently denied by the <br />Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Curtis stated at the December 13 meeting, the City Council reviewed the applicant’s request to permit a <br />6-foot expansion of the existing garage. The Council tabled the application to give the Planning <br />Commission an opportunity to review the applicant’s revised plans. <br /> <br />The applicant presented his revised plans for the 6-foot garage addition to the Planning Commission at the <br />January 21 meeting. The applicant is requesting average lakeshore, lakeshore, and side setback and <br />hardcover variances. The Planning Commission reviewed the applicant’s request, heard testimony from <br />the applicant and an adjacent neighbor who opposes the variances. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission voted 4-2 in favor of a motion to approve the request allowing the 6-foot <br />expansion of the existing attached garage. The deck/porch area above the garage was not included in the <br />approval recommendation. The Planning Commission further recommended that future requests to add <br />additional hardcover to the driveway, particularly in the easement area, should not be approved. <br /> <br />Planning Staff continues to recommend denial of the variances. <br /> <br />Curtis stated she has some photographs from the applicant depicting the area behind the rear garage wall. <br />Curtis noted the 2001 plan shows the two-stall portion of the garage with a 23-foot depth while the <br />current plan suggests an 18-foot depth. It is Staff’s speculation that at some time since 2001 the rear wall <br />of the garage was relocated. <br /> <br />Levang asked if the City Council can view the photographs that have been submitted. <br /> <br />Curtis displayed the two photographs provided by the applicant. <br /> <br />Levang asked if the mechanical equipment is located behind the two double doors. <br /> <br />Wang stated yes the mechanical equipment is behind the two double doors. <br /> <br />Levang asked if the mechanical equipment is on the other side of that wall. <br /> <br />Wang indicated there is a small corridor that goes to the room but that the pictures show the mechanical <br />equipment. <br /> <br />Curtis asked if the configuration still consists of a walk-in closet and then the mechanical area.