My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-08-1998 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
06-08-1998 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2012 4:16:37 PM
Creation date
9/26/2012 4:16:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JUNE 8,1998 <br />PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - SANDY SMITH, REPRESENTATIVE <br />Commissioner Smith had no comments. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />There were no public comments. <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />( #5) #2308 BROOK PARK REALTY, 3760 SHORELINE DRIVE - PRD & CLASS iii <br />PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION <br />Moorse reported that the Settlement Agreement proposed by Brook Park Realty addresses the initial <br />20 units but doesn't tie the additional 10 units to the provision of access to County Road 15. The <br />property owners are proposing a number of triggers for the additional 10 units that would not <br />necessarily gain access to County Road 15. The City Attorney has responded that access to County <br />Road 15 is a necessary condition. <br />Bill Gleason, representative of the property owners, stated that he was unaware of the year 2001 date <br />being added as a trigger. <br />Jabbour responded that the City has tried to act in good faith to allow Brook Park to have a building <br />permit prior to the load limits being removed. He understood that a verbal agreement had been <br />reached three meetings ago, and now the landowner is not in agreement. <br />Gleason stated that his understanding was that the road would be connected at some time in the <br />future and the City would use their best efforts to work toward that end. He thought the letter was <br />to be drafted with more specific language regarding what would happen but he was surprised at the <br />addition of the 2001 date when the wording came back from their attorney. <br />Jabbour asked the applicant what he would like Council to do. <br />Gleason requested that the application be tabled for one more meeting and attempt to work on the <br />language. <br />Jabbour commented that if the developer built 10 units in each of the next three years, the project <br />would be complete by 2001 and that date would be irrelevant in the Agreement. Gleason responded <br />that their goal was to build 30 units in one year, and they could still get 20 built this year. <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.