Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 12, 2016 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />16. #15-3763116-3860 CHRISTOPHER BOLLIS, 200-250 STUBBS BAY ROAD NORTH — <br />FINAL PLAT REVIEW (continued) <br />Bollis stated it has been a driveway since approximately 1978. <br />Gaffron noted the house to the west was constructed five to seven years ago. Gaffron stated those two <br />lots were previously one lot. <br />McMillan commented she is not sure she would allow a secondary access for the accessory building only. <br />Walsh stated if Lots 5 and 6 access that, it triggers an upgrade of the road and that the applicant is looking <br />to keep it as a secondary access. Walsh stated the question is whether that is acceptable without the <br />upgrades. <br />Bollis noted those two lots do not technically have frontage along Stubbs Bay Road. <br />McMillan stated her concern with the wiggle in the road is that people will likely drive down the middle <br />of the road, which is something to think about with regard to sight lines. <br />Walsh stated the neighbors feel that anything that potentially has the ability to slow traffic down is a <br />positive and that he is definitely supportive of the wiggle to help that. <br />McMillan indicated she is supportive of it as well as long as it works. McMillan asked if private roads <br />can install their own speed bumps. <br />Gaffron stated the City would not be opposed to it but that he is not sure whether the neighbors would be <br />in favor of it. <br />Walsh commented he now understands the concept of the curb and gutter as it relates to runoff. Walsh <br />stated if the construction traffic can just be limited to the paving equipment, that would be okay, and that <br />in his view the asphalt trucks can handle the drop-off. <br />Printup asked if the secondary access could be a construction road. <br />Bollis stated he is proposing to use it to either remodel the existing house or build a new house on Lot 5. <br />Bollis noted it is actually a driveway and not a road. <br />Walsh stated he would be supportive of that since he has not heard of any issues why that would be a <br />problem outside of the rule requiring an upgrade of the driveway. <br />Levang asked whether the applicant has any comments on the other items listed in Staff's report. <br />Bollis indicated he does not. <br />Levang asked if Staff was looking for something specific. <br />Gaffron stated he wanted to bring those to the attention of the applicant and the Council. Gaffron <br />indicated Staff will bring the final plat resolution before the Council in a couple of weeks. <br />Page 15 of 34 <br />