My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-15-2016 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2016
>
08-15-2016 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:27 PM
Creation date
9/20/2016 9:27:05 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
208
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� <br /> � <br /> 16-3855 <br /> August 10,2016 <br /> Page 2 of 9 <br /> past proposals or sketch plans for the property. Absent any apparent market desire for office uses <br /> in this area, coupled with the clear directives of the Orono Community Management Plan (CMP) <br /> that retail uses should not extend west of Willow Drive, the proposed senior housing use may be <br /> a reasonable alternative. It also has the potential to assist in meeting residential urban density <br /> goals in order to allow continued development of Orono's sewered lakeshore areas as intended. <br /> The property is currently zoned RR-1B PUD, One Family Rural Residential. The intent of this <br /> zoning was functionally a `holding' zone, with the property originally anticipated to be rezoned to <br /> B-6 PUD at the time of approval of a specific commercial development on the site. For the <br /> proposed residential continuum of care use, rezoning to RPUD would be most appropriate. <br /> The property has been located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) since 1980, <br /> and would be served with municipal sewer and water, for which connection charges are spelled <br /> out in the PUD No. 4 Agreement. <br /> Review Parameters <br /> The proposed residential development is a depariure from the CMP guiding of this site for <br /> commercial office use. For this reason, staff recommends that the Planning Commission's review <br /> should proceed by considering the following two basic questions: <br /> L Is this property a location where the City should depart from the current Comprehensive <br /> Plan guiding, and allow for high density residential development? <br /> 2. If so, what are appropriate standards for such a development? <br /> Planning Commission's primary focus should be on whether the proposed type and density of <br /> development is appropriate for this specific property. <br /> Conformity with the Orono 2008-2030 Community Management Plan <br /> The net development density based on 48 Independent and Assisted Living units would be 13.8 <br /> units per acre. The proposal to re-guide the site for High Density Residential in the defined range <br /> of 10-15 units per acre would be appropriate. <br /> Met Council and Density. In approving Orono's 2008-2030 CMP, Met Council took into account <br /> that Orono guided specific properties for higher density sewered development(3-7, 7-10,4-15 and <br /> 10-15 units per acre) in order to offset the long-planned sewered development at low densities in <br /> the Shoreland areas. In effect, the higher-density guiding of a select number of strategically <br /> located properties established a numerical `buffer' which allowed properties previously added to <br /> the MUSA and guided/planned for 2-acre minimum lot sizes, to be developed as historically <br /> planned. <br /> Problematic for the present is that in recent months two of those properties guided for higher <br /> density development have been re�uided via amendments of the CMP to lower densities, and in <br /> fact the `buffer' established in the 2008-2030 CMP has functionally been eliminated. In order to <br /> re-establish the buffer,Orono must reguide additional property for higher density. In the meantime, <br /> any new proposed developments at a density of less than 3.0 units per acre involving connection <br /> to or extension of the sewer system, will not be approved by Met Council. Reguiding of the <br /> applicants' property for residential use at high density would be a substantial step forward in re- <br /> establishing the necessary density buffer. <br /> Conformity with RPUD Zoning District Requirements <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.