My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-15-2016 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2016
>
08-15-2016 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:27 PM
Creation date
9/20/2016 9:27:05 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
208
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
16-3855 <br /> August 10,2016 <br /> Page 3 of 9 <br /> The property is currently zoned RR-1 B PUD and for the proposed development would be rezoned <br /> to RPUD. The RPUD District standards are found in Zoning Code Sections 78-621 thru 78-629. <br /> The RPUD district standards indicate an RPUD site must be at least 5 acres in area,but does allow <br /> for smaller sites under specific conditions, as noted in the code excerpt below: <br /> Sec. 78-626. - Development standards. Within the RPUD district all development shall be in <br /> compliance with the following: <br /> (1) Minimum area; shoreland district liinitation. Each site proposed for rezoning to RPUD shall have <br /> a minimum area of five acres, excluding areas within a designated wetland, floodplain or <br /> shoreland district ar right-of-way,unless the council finds the existence of one of the following: <br /> a. Unusual physical features of the property itself or of the surrounding neighborhood such that <br /> development as a RPUD will conserve a physical or topographic feature of importance to the <br /> neighborhood or community. <br /> b. The property is directly adjacent to or across a public street from property which has <br /> been developed previously as a RPUD or planned residential development and will be <br /> perceived as and will function as an extension of that previously approved development. <br /> c. The property is located in an area where the proposed development provides a transition <br /> between a cominercial ar industrial area and an existing residential area or on an intennediate <br /> or principal arterial as defined in the comprehensive plan. <br /> d. The property contains steep slopes or a substantial nuinber of significant trees that could be <br /> preserved through the clustering of buildings or other design techniques not generally allowed <br /> by the existing zoning district. <br /> No property located within 250 feet of the ordinary high water level (OHWL) of a protected lake <br /> or tributary as defined in article IX of this chapter shall be rezoned to RPUD. However, for a <br /> properry that is partially located less than 250 feet from the OHWL and partially located more than <br /> 250 feet from the OHWL,the portion located more than 250 feet from the OHWL inay be rezoned <br /> to RPUD at the discretion of the city council when all other reyuirements are met. <br /> (2) Uses. Each property rezoned to RPUD shall only be used for the use or uses for which the site is <br /> designated in the comprehensive plan, except that the city may permit rezoning to RPUD on a <br /> site designated for commercial use if the city council�nds that such use is in the best interests <br /> of the city and is consistent with the requirements of this division. If a commercial site is to <br /> be rezoned to RPUD, the city may forward a copy of the request to the metropolitan council <br /> for review. (emphasis added) <br /> It would appear that the provisions of 78-626(1)b would be applicable, as the proposed use is <br /> within the Stonebay Master Development and is directly across Kelley Parkway from the Stonebay <br /> Lofts, which are similarly zoned RPUD. Further, because the site is guided for commercial office <br /> use with the intention of being rezoned for commercial use, the rezoning would fit within the <br /> provisions of 78-626(2). It should be noted that the Council has recently approved and supported <br /> two smaller RPUD developments (Shadywood Villas and the Eisinger site) so that rezoning the <br /> Kelley Parkway parcel to RPUD would not be inconsistent. <br /> Relationship to Surrounding Development <br /> The proposed senior residential continuum of care use might be compared to a blending of the <br /> facilities offered at the Orono Woods Senior Housing at the intersection of Brown Road and <br /> Wayzata Boulevard, and the Trails of Orono Assisted Living and Memory Care facility at 875 <br /> Wayzata Boulevard. The proposed Stonebay location is directly across from the Stonebay Lofts <br /> which is a residential condominium development. To the immediate east of the Lofts, additional <br /> 2-story townhomes will eventually be completed. Directly east of applicants' site is the stormwater <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.