My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-13-1989 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
03-13-1989 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2012 11:47:26 AM
Creation date
9/5/2012 11:47:26 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 13, 1989 <br />#1364 EDWIN GAGE • <br />480 TONRAWA ROAD <br />REVISED PROPOSAL <br />RESOLUTION #2588 <br />Mr. Gage was not present for this matter, but was <br />represented by his landscape designer, Mr. Dale Gustafson. <br />Acting City Administrator Gerhardson explained that Mr. Gage <br />was seeking a hardcover variance in the 0 -75' setback zone, to <br />construct a 6' wide walkway. This item was previously reviewed <br />by the Council and was tabled at their February 13, 1989, <br />meeting. <br />Mr. Gustafson said that he had had an opportunity to explore <br />other options and questions that the Council had previously <br />discussed. One question was whether angling the posts would <br />offer more stability. It was determined that it would be very <br />difficult to auger the holes properly and in order to gain the <br />stability, the posts would need to be angled in such a way that <br />they would limit passage. Mr. Gustafson clarified why there was <br />a need for the walkway from the 929.4' elevation, shoreward. The <br />existing dock extends across a marshy bay. The aspect of <br />dredging was explored but Mr. Gage believed it would have a <br />negative impact on the bay. The ground in that area is very <br />spongy and muddy and the walkway would allow pedestrians to get <br />from the dock to dry ground. Mr. Gustafson and Mr. Gage felt <br />• <br />that the 6' width would offer more stability. If a 4' width were <br />used, there would be more tendency for the walkway, in time, to <br />shift. Once installed, it will be very difficult to repair or <br />correct any problems caused by the shifting. When this proposal <br />was presented to the DNR, they felt that the 6' width would be <br />acceptable because it would make the walkway more safe and <br />stable. Because of the unique area in which this walkway would <br />be placed, Mr. Gustafson did not believe that approval of the 6' <br />width would be precedent- setting. <br />Councilmember Goetten stood firm on her previous <br />recommendation of a 4' walkway. She commented that input from <br />the City Engineer would have been helpful in determining whether <br />the 6' width would actually add more stability and safety. Mr. <br />Gustafson explained that the walkway, which was "a matter of <br />convenience and practicality ", was adding 420 s.f. of hardcover <br />in an area where there was currently no hardcover. The hardcover <br />would be such that it would be a f lat surface, over a marsh area, <br />where there would be no impact on runoff due to any water running <br />off the edge of the walkway into the marsh. The use of a metal <br />grate that would be 20% hardcover and 80% open was explored as an <br />option to deal with the hardcover issue. Mr. Gustafson also <br />invited the Council to dictate the spacing of the boards of the <br />wood walkway, if approved, to allow for maximum runoff. <br />Councilmember Nettles asked Mr. Gustafson for clarification • <br />as to whether the 6' wide metal grate would be more porous than a <br />4' wide wood walkway? Mr. Gustafson stated that the metal grate <br />proposal was being mentioned as an option to adequately handle <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.