|
! �� i f
<br /> • henr#Il-CCAgenda-12/Il/06
<br /> Frle#06-3234/35[Total Pages 94J
<br /> percent if possible. The location of the house and driveway on the western lot(4731)does.not allow for a
<br /> 20-foot deep apron to Ue located enticely on tl�e 4731 property and outside the shared drive aisle.
<br /> The applicant has indicated he will instali a shared trlm system to access the lakeshore which
<br /> incorporates a sn�all stair in order to minimize slope impacts.
<br /> L�
<br /> - . � i�+�`k �}t.
<br /> }`66t:JSYc IS. �I?fn, .
<br /> �t����rt��� ��;Ei�...
<br /> '�``� l',y��
<br /> �-� `�+.y.��i�� �r�
<br /> Staff recommends approval of the subdivision of a lot�hne iearranaeme,n�:��fh:street vacation and
<br /> #���J ,-" <�rF� ;�",�'�Y�`�s„
<br /> yav� x�41,vi'¢`s3�'�,tf��`� � � �
<br /> variances to allow rep]acemeut of the existing iwo homes�on lots til�at are more'equal in size�Chan the
<br /> •���y�-�='��e.���.�'�.��:'" '������'����{��������,
<br /> ��� �Cn�`SF�Yp'.%�+� �.�i+�h'1{t.�,E., x KLrYr .
<br /> current configuration subject to,one,compliance witl�therrecommei�dations of the Gct�Engineer;two,
<br /> f�dy�+r���b �'r�f.� 4 ���i���7��
<br /> l}�el�_� n� 4y�t��`i�•Cu'�.
<br /> ���� I
<br /> the homes meeting the City's height requirement of 30 feet and�2 S�,sforie`s.�three,submittal of easements
<br /> °��>s;{'rf�k;i;�'�>'a?T';:'
<br /> �l+y_,w 5��„i.i�i'.n'�''�f?
<br /> for the sl�ared drivewa and sl�ared tramwa �r�"���� �� �Y=`�` ���''�
<br /> Y y' �g�.������ t�±���a y�,L„
<br /> �i,�����,}�'�,.�+�y 4�'�� Y�����r xt�
<br /> Hessburg stated Staff has been very helpful jt�i thelr`applicafioii , °'�
<br /> �;
<br /> �",e-r� �. T�'+,�'u��,�",�
<br /> f�,��"'��� �'��u'�����°'�•
<br /> Meyer stated by having both of these properEies�for sale`a�,one fime�and Tieing able to develop them botl�
<br /> ��� �� ��'���T
<br /> � ��
<br /> simultaneously a much more complemirtaiy�devef pme�t can b�e�ach�eved.
<br /> � r
<br /> e����A�'�;. ����Y��13'�`�'��'�t�
<br /> Kroeger stated in his opinion it vyould�be more idea}_to combine the lots and construct one house ratl�er�
<br /> t �, � � },,,��n.,�
<br /> L��,����' ��� �'�'� ar'*,��r°
<br /> ' t�t2�'< `�.:�.-�
<br /> than iwo l�omes. �`..��'�,�,1��k�,d'�. �
<br /> '�,�4-0� ,,�s���e�..
<br /> . �`Vy lgR�,c��y:Y rt`��,k� A . .
<br /> � �t T 4 �!' iT'} 4[El,t�
<br /> Kempf inquued�vuhat#-Ehe s(thyiation �s witll�t�he dL�veway. �
<br /> ��},`�,*,�'S��t�.`�`l�y�''�f�`v`'fi*vl J3h��H 4$ke' "'�t�^�e a.ii
<br /> .� 1 r�4StKV�!�
<br /> s�-. '�#p.�rv�������.y't �.'F a �ll5t F�
<br /> (�+ 'tl+� ��'a�.� 'S pr� �-1� ��a i4�ca 96,i �
<br /> HessbuLg�stated he metQw4fh a;reptesentattve�frotn�he County and his recommendation is to construct one
<br /> {��u����r'�`�' ���'ti� ��<-.`�r��, "��`t::�r
<br /> ;�. x�iS`�a� '�,s �ry,"ik'�k �'
<br /> di,i:veway�'rom Couniy Road a19'��'���;
<br /> a.�=���YS�i �"� ,#�,�,.�Sy�c-.
<br /> ?��5"�a+�.�r.�+. . `��SC���,-t:
<br /> ICemp�commented he is iu favor o�the:shared driveway,noting that it would reduce the amount of
<br /> ��� �� t, 4 � �.�
<br /> �����`°i�'��"�,��t'�,-� ��w u�`���
<br /> hardcovet�o��'�t�el�l,�ots�Kempf uofe�d�.�Glie city Engineer has recomiuended•that the steepness of the
<br /> � r�,� � r� ��,.,.
<br /> ������?� ��'���'��;:
<br /> drivewly be re e�valua e�audxeyrsed to allow for a 20-foot area directly off the roadway with a slope no
<br /> '��k��f �s!r.��%��';�'.:r'
<br /> `w'#�'�-�,`,�,,�5'�:
<br /> greater iLlan 2 percent�i�p�sible. Kempf inquired wl�ether tliat issue has been addressed.
<br /> Hessburg indiclted l�e would be wilting to wock with the city engineei•on that issue.
<br /> Kempf stated provided the applicant is willing to work with tlle city engineer to address that item,he
<br /> would not be op��osed to the two lots since there are a number of other similar sized fots currently in
<br />
|