My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-14-1999 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
06-14-1999 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2012 4:48:23 PM
Creation date
8/1/2012 4:48:23 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 <br />is APPROVAL #2480 SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB, 725 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH -FINAL PLAT <br />APPROVAL - Continued <br />completed quickly. He questioned the request to put the trail in up to the wetland. He <br />understood that it was to be completed up to the maintenance facility. <br />Flint said the contract provides that the trail will be put in up to the wetland. <br />Crosby agreed, but he thought that subsequent discussions had it only going to the driveway. <br />Flint said that is Tim Johnson's side of the discussion, but the City said no, build it to the <br />wetland. He said that on the description of the easement, he wants it left as a ten -foot <br />easement. He said the agreement provides for a four -foot trail. If the easement is defined as <br />the middle of the four -foot trail, it would be virtually impossible for anyone to maintain the <br />trail because you need room on either side. <br />Crosby said he would not have a problem with saying two feet, together with the <br />maintenance. He said the issue is for a subsequent Council that looks at this thinking they have <br />all this space and then want to reroute the trail. <br />Flint said the trail has already been moved because the original plan for the trail that the City <br />had was to go on the golf course side of the wetland in the area of East Long Lake Road and <br />. Spring Hill Road. There was great concern about that by the golf course because of safety <br />reasons. The City backed off to the point of taking the ten -foot easement along the edge and <br />having a little flexibility for the trail. He wants to stay with the original agreement. <br />Barrett asked if there should be two descriptions, one of the easement and one of the trail. <br />Flint thought the agreement contemplated that the easement would be ten feet except where <br />the trail actually goes further. <br />Crosby said that is what the legal description says. <br />Jabbour said the original agreement was for a ten -foot easement to run parallel to the property <br />line. When the City staff and the golf course staff visited the site, they could see that there was <br />a natural direction for the trail that would preserve trees which was beyond the ten feet. He <br />asked if they were saying that in that area, they do not want the City to have the ten feet that <br />they are not using plus all the area beyond the ten feet because at some places it could be as <br />wide as 30 feet. He asked if Crosby would rather describe the easement based on the existing <br />trail plus two feet on each side it. <br />Crosby said that in the area where the trail has not been constructed, he would describe the <br />center line, give two feet on each side of the center line and some additional area for <br />• maintenance rights. He said the reason for that is to avoid someone coming in at a later date <br />Page 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.