My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-14-1999 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1999
>
06-14-1999 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2012 4:48:23 PM
Creation date
8/1/2012 4:48:23 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JUNE 14,1999 <br />( #9) #2480 SPRING HILL GOLF CL UB, 725 SIXTH A VENUE NORTH -FINAL PLAT . <br />APPROVAL - Continued <br />Jabbour said at the time Spring Hill made its application, he had suggested that if Spring Hill <br />did not want to give the City the trail, he would vote for the application without the trail. <br />Now, there is a legal document between the City and Spring Hill and it is his fiduciary <br />responsibility to the City to see that the terms of the agreement are met. He said the original <br />idea was to use Spring Hill's tunnel to cross Co. Rd. 6. That idea has been abandoned so the <br />crossing must be on Co. Rd. 6. He suggested that representatives from the Council, City staff <br />and the golf course meet at the site and review the issues so that Spring Hill knows what <br />needs to be done. <br />Flint said he doesn't think knowing what needs to be done is the issue. He believes Tim <br />Johnson knows exactly what needs to be done and that he could finish it in two weeks. He <br />said the difficult issue is building the trail in the County right -of -way. <br />Crosby said he understands that the County will not allow the trail to be built on their right -of- <br />way because of the dangerous crossing. <br />Gappa said he met with the County and they refused to discuss building the trail on their right - <br />of -way. <br />Flint said there are two ways to deal with that issue. One way is to build the trail on Spring , <br />Hill's property, but that leaves a segment with the question of how you get across the County <br />property. The other way is to do it the long way, by getting the County to approve it. <br />Crosby said that Spring Hill could post a bond where the City has discretion to go forward if <br />it's not done on an acceptable basis within a period of time. He agreed that there should be a <br />meeting with the golf course management where Crosby is present. He does not want to build <br />something that is unsightly or dangerous if there is a possibility of the County giving <br />permission to build the trail on its right -of -way. <br />Sansevere asked if Spring Hill could revisit using a part of the cart path to cross Co. Rd. 6. <br />Crosby said Spring Hill objects to using the tunnel to cross Co. Rd. 6 because it is not <br />constructed for use in the winter and in the summer, it would be right in the middle of the golf <br />course. <br />Jabbour said it is too late to use the tunnel because the tunnel is already built and the size of <br />the tunnel does not lend itself to being divided for public and private use. <br />Crosby would like to arrange a meeting. He said that Spring Hill has announced to its <br />membership that they are going to open in late June. He would like to see if through bonding <br />or some other means they could preserve the opening date. He thinks most of the work can be • <br />Page 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.