Laserfiche WebLink
• c r <br /> • FILE 09-3418 ' <br /> July 20, 2009 <br /> Page 4 of 5 <br /> �ecial Notes The existing building does not have fire sprinklers because it was built before <br /> they were required and has not had a change of occupancy or addition.. The additions would <br /> � have sprinklers and the existing building would have to be retrofitted. <br /> The west addition would add another story to the existing party wa11 with 3465 Shoreline <br /> Drive. Tlie applicant indicates the party wall agreement allows for this. Before fmal <br /> approval the City Attorney would need to review this document to conf'irm this arid ensure it <br /> includes a mechanism for makirig any required changes to the wall and windows of 3465 <br /> ' above the proposed addition. <br /> Variances <br /> Buildin� Setback A setback of 29 feet from Kelly Avenue right of way is proposed for the <br /> east addition when the required setback is 35 feet. A setback of 0 feet from the west properry <br /> line is proposed for the upper level of the west addition when the required setback is 35 feet. <br /> Number of Parking Spaces The plan.has about 80 percent of the parking spaces required by <br /> code. The deficiency is 23 spaces. The beauty salon in the basement of the 3465 Shoreline <br /> Drive building rents nine parking spaces. This property owner can terminate this agreement <br /> at any time but does not want to as it would require the beauty salon to close or to expand the <br /> parking lot on the 3465 property. Not terminating the agreement would increase the parking <br /> space deficiency to 32 spaces. <br /> The concept plan had a°53 deficiency of spaces. -The deficiency has been reduced by revising <br /> the site plan to add four parking spaces and by calculating the number of required parking <br /> spaces based on the code standard one space for every 150 square feet of floor area excluding <br /> storage, common and utility areas rather than a flat rate of one space for every 200 square <br /> feet of gross floor area. Both stores have an unusually large portion of their premises <br /> devoted to storage. Future tenants would be limited to the same arrangement. <br /> Parkin� lot setbacks Setback variances are requested for both parking lot expansions. The <br /> new portion of the upper parking lot would be located 4.16 feet from the right of way of <br /> Shoreline Drive and 3.5 feet from the right of way of Kelly Avenue. Code requires a 10 foot � <br /> setback from Shoreline Drive and a 20 foot setback from Kelly Avenue. The new portion of <br /> the lower parking area would be 8.42 feet from the south property line when the code would � <br /> require a 15 foot setback (because the adjacent property is residential). It would be 15 feet <br /> from the right of way of Kelly Avenue when a 20 foot setback is required. <br /> Structure setbacks The upper trash enclosure is proposed to have a 3.5 foot setback from <br /> Kelly Avenue when a 20 foot setback is required. The lower trash enclosure is proposed to <br /> have a 0 foot setback from the west property line when a five foot setback is required. Both <br /> are proposed to have less than the required 10 foot sepaxation between a principal structure <br /> and an accessory structure. <br /> Structural Covera�e and Hardcover Some hardcover would be removed; some would be <br /> added. (See Exhibit I.) Part of both additions would change from non-structural hardcover to <br /> structural'hardcover. Structural Coverage (the percenta.ge of the site covered by building) <br />