Laserfiche WebLink
, j <br /> . . FILE 09-3418 <br /> July 20, 2009 <br /> Page 5 of 5 <br /> would increase from 19. 94percent to 27.57 percent. The maximum allowed is 15 percent. <br /> .,r:- z, <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Staff s ana.lysis of this application is unchanged from the concept application: What is <br /> proposed is simply too much for this site. There is no space for adequate parking or <br /> landscaping. If there are not enough parking spaces, customers will park in the 3465 <br /> Shorelirie Drive parking lot, on Kelly Avenue and/or in the Lunds' parking lot. The � <br /> pavement of Kell� Avenue is only 28 feet wide, not wide enough for on-street paxking. <br /> There may congestion as drivers look for a parking space. Eventually businesses may move <br /> or close if the parking is inadequate. . <br /> Landscaping, especially adjacent to a street, is important to creating an atlxactive commercial . <br /> area. Trees, in particular, have many environmental benefits. Not only do they provide <br /> shade, filter the air, and buffer noise, a recent innovation is to have to runoff from parking <br /> areas flow into landscaped areas planted with trees. The landscaping, especially the trees, . <br /> absorbs the runoff. The most of the proposed landscaped areas are minimal and axe <br /> probably too sma11 to sustain the plant materials for any length of time. <br /> In addition to concerns about the variances staff has concerns about the design of the <br /> building including compatibility of the facade of the existing building with the additions, the <br /> detailing on the front and sides of the additions, and the architectural treatment of the rear <br /> walls of the additions. Some of these concerns may be addressed with more detailed plans. <br /> Staff also has concerns about the connection between the upper and lower parking areas. The <br /> stairs would be about three feet wide with retaining walls on both sides. (Similar to the <br /> existing stairs.) There would be a similar narrow passage between the building and the <br /> dumpster enclosure. This would not create a welcoming situation. The stairs could be <br /> opened up by changing the location of the retaining walls but there is no obvious way to <br /> eliminate the passage between the dumpster enclosure and the building. <br /> Monuments signs are limited to ten feet in height. Sta.ff would point out that the view of the <br /> bottom portion of the proposed sign for east bound traffic would be blocked by vehicles in <br /> the adjacent parking spaces. <br /> Action Requested <br /> If the Commission is satisfied with the proposal or the applicant is amenable to making it <br /> satisfactory the Planning Commission should give the applicant direction and ta.ble <br /> consideration until the grading plan and drainage calculations have been received and found <br /> satisfactory by the City Engineer and the revised plans submitted. <br /> If the Commission is not satisfied with the proposal and the applicant is not amenable <br /> changes to make it satisfactory, the Commission should make a recommendation for denial. <br /> The applicant could then choose to have Council initially consider the proposal with or <br /> without the grading plan and drainage calculations. An approval could not occur without the <br /> City Engineer's approval of the grading plan and drainage calculations. <br />