Laserfiche WebLink
. � Item#09-CC Agenda-OS/14/07 <br /> File#07-3259[Total P'agks 41J ' ` • <br /> . ��"�''�� <br /> MIIVUT�S OF THE <br /> . ORONO PLANNING CONIlVI.ISSION - ' <br /> Tuesday,Februlry 20,2007 <br /> � 6:00 o'clock p.m. . ' <br /> 4. Whether a hardcover variaiice should be granted for the 75-250 foot zone,,given that this is a � � <br /> total rebuild on a lot that is nearly confonning in width and has a substantial hardcover allotinent for <br /> � the 75-250 foot zone; � � <br /> � 5. Whether there is any issue with attaching the house to the esisting garabe that is slightly too <br /> . . close to the lot line. � . � <br /> Tlte Planning Commission should discuss the following issues: � : . <br /> 1. The proposal is to keep the basic house footprint locatioii inlact,but removing the wirig near the . � <br /> street,fill in the NE cot7�er,and replace the e�isting half-story with a full story. This will result in a ' <br /> new second-stoiy encroachment massing within l8 feet of the street lot line where a 30-foot setback is • . � <br /> required,but will eliminate the oi�e-level wing that encroaches as close as 13.5 feet to the street lot � <br /> line. � <br /> 2. The newtwo-story connectina link�ill not have a basement connection to�lle.garage,but rvilI � . <br /> attach the garage to the hoiise with new foyer and living space above it. <br /> 3. The detached garage will become attached,and the applicants gain livable space witl�iii its � <br /> .roofline; dormers are being added to maximize the usabilify of that space. Access to the storage area <br /> belo�v the garage will remain via an exterior door on the lakeside. ' - . - <br /> 4. The bonus room appears to have the amenities to serve as a guest apartment(half bath with . . <br /> shower;closets; a separate sink with undefined possible stove/refrigerator slot ne�t to it)vvitl�the . . � <br /> exception that tlie plans do not show a stairway from the main garage level to it. Applicants should � • . <br /> advise�vhat the inteution is for tl�is space and whether access to it fi•oin the;arage is intended. . . : . � <br /> � Depending on the proposed use and access,a guest apartment CUP could be required. � . <br /> 5. The appiicants have indicated the foundation has a variety of flaws. They have provided�some • : <br /> initiat design work from a structural engineer that suggests m�st of the e�isting house foundation will � <br /> be replaced. This appears to coiiflict with the demo plan elevation vie�vs which indicale e�isting <br /> foundation to remain. The structural engineer's plan sug;esfs tl�at the poirtion of the foundation that is <br /> . . � � � �'AGL 18 . . . . . <br />