Laserfiche WebLink
� Item#09-CC Agenda-OS/14/07 <br /> ' � File#07-3259[Total Pa 41J <br /> ��'�� � � <br /> MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMNIISSION ,� ,.f�W�� <br /> Tuesdly,February 20,2007 � ��«--� <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. � t�-'� � <br /> 7. #07-3259 LAKE COUNTRY BUII�D�RS FOR GARY AND KA.THRYN GANGSTEE, <br /> � 1374 REST POINT ROAD,VARIANCE,7:30-8:13 P.M.. � � . , <br /> Peter Jacobson and Ryan Smolik on behalf of Lake Country Builders wece present. - � <br /> Gaffron stated the appiicants are requesting certain variances to allow modificatiou and e�pansion of • � <br /> the e�isting house aild garage,including removal of t]Ze wing of the]louse closest to the street,a � <br /> 40 square foot addition to the house,reconstruction and e�pansion of tlle second stoty of the house, : • <br /> the addition of dormers to the garage roof.and construction of a two-story link between the house and � <br /> garage. The variances being requested include the following: � � <br /> . l. Street setback for the house of. 18 feet where a 12-foot setback cun•ently exists and a 30-foot <br /> setback is required. ' <br /> 2. Maintain a side setback for the eYisting garage of 9.1 feet when a 10-foot setback is required. ' <br /> 3. .. To have 29.8 percent hardcover in the 75-250 foot zone when 25 percent is allowed aild 30.3 � <br /> percent currently exists and to allow the 0-75 foot zone to remain with 9.0 percent hardcover. <br /> The applicants are proposing this as a remodet;not a rebuild. One of their goals is to be able to retain <br /> the nonconforming pool which is partially within the 0-75 foot zone and contributes to etcess � <br /> hardcover on the site. �. .� <br /> Staff recotnmends the Planning Commission table this application after providing the applicants with . : � <br /> direction regarding the following issues: � . �� •� <br /> l. Whether#liis should be co�isidered a total rebuilci; . . � � ' . <br /> 2. Whether there is justification based on the e�tent of tlte project to require a conforming 30- ' . � . .� ,: ' <br /> foot street setback instead of allowing a second story at the 18-foot setback; � � � � <br /> 3. Whether the applicants should be granted a hardcover variailce to be allowed to keep the pool�, � � <br /> given that it is nonconforming and partially in the 0-75 foot zone,and that it is the primaiy reason for ' <br /> e�cess hardcover on the site; ' • <br /> � � P AC��,E 17 . . . <br />