My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-13-2006 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2006
>
03-13-2006 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 4:26:56 PM
Creation date
7/25/2012 4:26:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO. CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 13, 2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. • <br />(7. #06 -3173 CITY OF ORONO — ORDINANCE AMENDMENT: INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT <br />ZONING STANDARDS, Continued) <br />and objectives. Gaffron stated the people who reviewed this ordinance preferred the more subjective <br />language. <br />Acting Mayor White stated the concern was with outpricing the market. <br />Moorse pointed out the language allows a property owner to come in with a request for a conditional use <br />permit. Moorse stated under'the CUP process, there is enough flexibility to have something that would <br />work within the industrial zone. <br />Murphy stated Orono's industrial area is rather limited and that they have not had standards well <br />developed or defined, which is the reason for this ordinance. Murphy stated he does not want to <br />apologize for doing the best job the City can in making sure the standards set an appropriate tone for what <br />the City envisions for that area. <br />McMillan noted there is residential to the west and to the south, with a highway between, but that the <br />ordinance is being sensitive to the surrounding area, which is another reason to have this standard <br />included. <br />Greg White stated he is not interested in seeing a substandard development in this area but that it may <br />impact potential buyers as well. White stated there are so many uncertainties and ambiguities that it is • <br />impossible to plan for an economic development that makes sense. White stated if the entire industrial <br />district is looked at, the undeveloped 11 acres the architectural standards apply to do not make economic <br />sense for an industrial park. White stated they are the highest standards for a property that typically does <br />not attract the higher paying tenants that an office park would. <br />Greg White indicated this language would put the property owners in a very difficult position of knowing <br />that the written standard is not economically feasible but that a conditional use permit may be something <br />that is economically feasible within the permitted uses of the district but that the city council is the <br />deciding body. White stated in his opinion it is too uncertain and too subjective. <br />Murphy stated he appreciates Mr. White's opinion but that he is comfortable with the language being <br />subjective. Murphy stated the Council should be able to take other things into consideration when <br />making a decision on a particular application. <br />Greg White stated the architectural standards are very specific. <br />Mark Shooney, Ryan Companies, stated they see it as a first -class industrial park but that Greg White has <br />made a valid point and that the site is designed more toward lower -end rent payers. Shooney stated it is a <br />materials issue and that the materials being specified are utilized more for higher payingrenters. Shooney <br />indicated his struggle with the current language is the prescribed materials, which limits a design effort <br />and places economic burdens on the developer. Shooney noted 67 percent of the building has to be made <br />out of brick, stucco or stone, which are typically not industrial materials. <br />McMillan inquired what a reasonable threshold would be. <br />PAGE 22 of 27 <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.