My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-13-2006 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2006
>
03-13-2006 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 4:26:56 PM
Creation date
7/25/2012 4:26:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, :March 13, 2006 <br />• 7:00 'clock p.m. <br />*6. #06 -3169 CHRISTOPHER DIESEN, 1100 TOWNLINE ROAD — PRELIMINARY PLAT — <br />RESOLUTION NO. 5435 <br />Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt <br />Preliminary Approval of a Class III Subdivisi( <br />VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />7. #06 -3173 CITY OF ORONO — ORD <br />ZONING STANDARDS <br />Sansevere inquired whether Mr. Johnson had any <br />ESOLUTION NO. 5435, a Resolution Granting <br />for Property Located at 1100 Townline Road. <br />AMENDMENT: INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT <br />its or concerns with the revisions. <br />Johnson stated the sound barrier in his opinion is a little overkill. Johnson noted they do not have any <br />plans for erecting any signs facing south but questioned whether that would be ineffective or accomplish <br />anything. Johnson stated they would like to see this amendment completed one way or another and that <br />their main issues have been addressed. <br />McMillan stated after reading the memo from Steve Grittman, she is fine with the recommendations <br />regarding retail. <br />White stated he is also fine with the retail. White inquired about the signage facing south. <br />• Murphy stated he has received more than one comment from the people who live across that area since <br />the cover is gone, but that the comments were not directed at Morrie's. Murphy stated the concern raised <br />had to do with the lights. <br />Johnson stated they are ready to see the ordinance adopted. <br />Greg White, VCI Capital, stated he was not present at the last Council meeting, but that he believes most <br />of the proposed revisions are appropriate and desirable. White stated Section 78 -826, which relates to the <br />building design and architectural standards, is, in their opinion, not appropriate for an industrial park. <br />White stated that section imposes a higher standard of construction than other adjoining districts across <br />the street, as an example, and that the language seems to be quite subjective. White stated they do not <br />believe that the proposed revisions, particularly in that section, reflect the reality of what the industrial <br />park is. White noted the industrial park consists of 44 acres, with 11 acres still buildable. White noted <br />only a small percentage of the industrial park would be impacted by the higher costs and would not be <br />consistent with the other buildings located within the industrial park. White stated the higher quality <br />construction, would also need to attract a higher paying tenant and that he does not feel it is possible to <br />attract that type of tenant. <br />Greg White suggested as an alternative that the design requirements for the industrial district not be more <br />stringent than what currently exists. White noted h I has put his comments into written form. <br />Acting Mayor White inquired whether the concern deals with less massing in the commercial district <br />than an industrial district. i <br />• Gaffron stated the City's existing B districts do not have much in the way of standards and that the same <br />kind of upgrades could be done to the other districts'! Gaffron stated in the early discussions with the <br />City's consultant there was a question on whether the City was going to go with performance standards <br />PAGE 21 of 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.