My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-11-2008 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2008
>
02-11-2008 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2012 2:16:01 PM
Creation date
7/23/2012 1:10:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. II <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, �ebruary 11, 2008 <br />• 7:00 clock p.m. <br />(5. #07 -3329 DAVID W. BERG ON <br />NORTH SHORE DRIVE, Continued) <br />Berg stated he also was just told on Friday that <br />the framing inspection. Berg stated given the c <br />OF WARRENAND JERNICE BERG, 3669 <br />plastic and rock would have to be removed prior to <br />weathei, the rock would be very difficult to remove. <br />Curtis noted a certificate of occupancy is not issued for a second story and that the framing inspection is <br />the only time that the inspector could stop the project if the plastic and rock is not removed or other <br />conditions are not complied with. <br />Berg indicated the resolution is a legal <br />Rahn asked whether there would be any funds <br />Curtis stated there would not be. <br />tand that he would be removing the rock. <br />in escrow on this project. <br />Rahn noted the City is not always called for a final inspection and that the City wants to verify that the <br />requested work is completed prior to the project being finished. <br />Rahn noted the 0 -75 foot zone and the 75 -250 fo <br />currently exists. <br />I <br />Bremer asked whether the deck is existing. <br />• j <br />Berg stated it is. <br />White commented the deck could be reduced to ] <br />Berg indicated the deck would not count as <br />Bremer noted with the removal of the shed, the c <br />Murphy moved, Bremer seconded, to adopt R <br />Variances for the Property Located at 3669 N <br />McMillan Opposed. <br />McMillan indicated she is opposed to the <br />'6. #08 -3338 THOMAS AND KA <br />VARIANCES AND DRIVEWAY AP: <br />Thomas and Katherine Ziegler, Applicants, were <br />Turner stated the Zieglers are proposing to recon; <br />allows them to reconstruct a structure without me <br />floodplain. Turner noted the basement would be <br />• applicants are requesting a setback variance to cc <br />from the right -of -way of Crystal Bay Road when <br />applicants are requesting a setback variance to ad <br />zone have reductions in hardcover from what <br />reduce the structural coverage. <br />coverage given its height. <br />ige on the structural coverage would be 41 feet. <br />LUTION NO. 5722, a Resolution Granting <br />Shore Drive. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1, <br />in structural coverage. <br />ZIEGLER, 2264 SHADYWOOD ROAD — <br />WIDTH <br />uct the existing house under a code provision that <br />ing the zoning code requirement except for the <br />iminated and it would be slab on grade. The <br />otruct an attached garage with an 11.2 foot setback <br />15 -foot setback is required. In addition, the <br />an open porch with a 5 -foot setback from the right- <br />PAGE 7 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.