Laserfiche WebLink
�l <br />MINUTES OF TEE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 11, 2008 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. •. <br />(6. #08 -3338 THOMAS AND KATHERINE ZIEGLER, 2264 SHAD YWOOD ROAD, <br />Continued) <br />of -way of Crystal Bay Road when a 15 -foot setback is required, a lakeshore setback variance to create <br />an open porch over a portion of the enclosed porch, and a hardcover variance to allow the steps on the <br />lake side of the house to be relocated to the Crystal Bay Road side of the enclosed porch. <br />The applicants are proposing a driveway approach that is 26 feet wide at the right -of -way line and 20 <br />feet wide at the edge of the roadway. The code limits the approach to 20 feet at the right -of -way and 30 <br />feet at the edge of the roadway. <br />The Planning Commission voted 7 -0 to recommend approval of the setback variance for the attached <br />garage subject to no additional hardcover in the 75 -250 foot zone. If the wider driveway approach is not <br />approved by the Council, the outer edges of the garage doors should be no more than 20 feet apart. <br />In addition the Planning Commission recommended approval of the lakeshore setback variance for the <br />second floor open porch subject to the porch being left open; approval of the setback variance for the <br />open entry porch, subject to the porch being reduced from five feet to four feet in depth and "wood" <br />columns on masonry bases being substituted for the brick or stone columns; and approval of the <br />hardcover variance to allow the steps and grade -level deck within the 0 -75 foot setback. <br />The grading plan still increases the runoff to the property to the north and lacks details on the proposed <br />drain tile. Staff has suggested the applicant work with the property owner to the north to create a • <br />common swale. <br />Staff supports a second floor deck on the lake side of the house but not a roof over it to create an open <br />porch. Although it will have little, if any, impact on the lake view from the property to the north, it is <br />entirely within the 0 -75 foot setback. It would set a precedent for allowing decks within the 0 -75 foot <br />zone to be converted to open porches. <br />Ziegler stated he is attempting to work out an arrangement with his neighbor on the drainage and that he <br />is confident some type of agreement would be reached. Ziegler stated they have done everything they <br />could to reduce the hardcover in all areas. The small portion of roof being added over the deck helps to <br />direct the water runoff and provides protection for the deck. Ziegler stated he would not be opposed to <br />having a stipulation in the file that the deck never be turned into closed space. <br />Rahn commented the deck hand railing is not required by code but would. be considered structural <br />coverage. <br />Ziegler stated their original plan was a second story over the entire structure, but following discussions <br />with Staff, they revised their plans to reduce the encroachment into the 0 -75 foot zone. Ziegler <br />indicated the whole house would have gutters and downspouts. If the roof over the deck is not allowed, <br />Ziegler stated he would probably eliminate it. - <br />Rahn asked whether the Planning Commission was okay with the roof over the front entry. <br />Turner stated the Planning Commission did not have an issue with the roof over the front entry. • <br />PAGE 8 of 12 <br />