Laserfiche WebLink
'� ' � FILE#06-3184 <br /> 10 May 11,2006 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> (�' Hardcover Vari�nce <br /> ! ; The applicant is proposing 36.2% hardcover witluii the 75' —250' zone and is removing <br /> the existuig residence and hardcover. The a�plicant is proposing to construct a home <br /> � with a 1,847 s.f. footprint with a 148 s.f. deck. � <br /> The applicant's has proposed, a home with a 1,847 s.f. footpriiit uicluding a garage, 1,522 <br /> �' s.f. of driveway (within this zone), 148 s.f. deck, 145 s.f. of sidewalk, and 168 s.f. of <br /> - � retaining wall and window well make up the 36.2% proposed hardcover. The driveway <br /> and sidewallcs as proposed are ininiinal. <br /> l.-� This application was compared to other lakeshore `total rebuilds' occurring dt�riiig fihe six <br /> year period 1999-2004, using the charts (Exhibit G) created by staff to ilhistrate the <br /> recent relatioilship between lot area, square footage of the 75-250' zone, approved house <br /> - � footprint, and 75-250' hardcover percentage. The intent of these cha.rts is to assist in <br /> analyzing what level of hardcover would be coiisistent with past rebttilds on lots with <br /> � similax chaiacteristics. <br /> � The chai�ts a.re sorted by three categories: 1) Total Lot Area; 2) 75-250' Zone Area; and <br /> �; 3) Approved Structttre Footprint. Applicant's proposal is based on: <br /> Total Lot Area= 19,572 s.f. <br /> ., 75-250' Zone Area= 10,582 s.f. <br /> ...� <br /> Structure Footprint Area= 1,995 s.f. <br /> -•, In coinparison,it appears that: � <br /> • Four lots with a similar total lot area (19,065 s.f. — 20,624 s.f.) have been <br /> ' � approved with 75-250' hardcover ranging fiom 25%to 38.6%... <br /> � • Four lots with a sinular 75-250' zone area (10,000 s.f. — 11,360 s.f.) have beeii <br /> 1__, <br /> approved for 75-250' hardcover ranging from 25%to 28.6%... <br /> • Four lots with a similar st�lict�iral fooipriut (1,811 s.f. — 1,985 s.f.) have been <br /> � approved for 75-250' hardcover ra.nging from 25%to 18.8%... <br /> !_; � <br /> Hardship Statement <br /> ( Applicant has completed the Hardslup Docunzentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and <br /> 1�., should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br /> �' Hardship Analysis <br /> ; Lr consideri�tg upplicatioirs for vrrriarice, t/re Plan�riug Co�nnussion slral! consi�ler ihe effect of f/ie <br /> proposerl uarirutce unoit t/re/eerrlf/t,safety mrd welfrrre of tJre conntrrnritJ�, ea:isti�rg antl tuaticipated traffrc <br /> i , conrlitiars, ligltt a�rd air, rlaager of fire, risk to tlie pirb/ic safety, med ilte effect ai valrres of property i�r <br /> tlre surro�ur�ling�rrea. Tlee P[auning Coi�rmissioa sliall co�rsitler recos�unentling�rpprova! for variances <br /> ��� fronr tlre literal provisions of tlie Zo�ring Code in i�rsta�ices rvlrere t/teir strict enforcef�ie�11 worrlrl ca[rse <br /> uttrkre ltarrls/rip because of circru�rstmices rr�tiqrre fo f/re iirtlividrral property unrler considerrrtioii, niid <br /> shall reconunend approval only wheu it is denronstrrrted t/tat such actioirs wi!!be in kee�ing wiNi tlre <br /> _, spiril a�rr!iirte�rt of f/ee Oro►to Zo�ring Co�le. <br /> Staff finds the lot area and widt�lij are jii�er�eni t,,�p_�,�he kproperty, �uld iio additional laizd is <br /> �,; available to increase the lot size. �It'�W(�Ll�_not el�e easonable to grant some level of <br /> hardcover variance to support�"`�lie�pi p�sed�hous��'which ilieets tlze lot coverage <br /> ��� �� �:�,. �� <br /> �� � � <br /> � <br /> i ' <br /> I <br /> �., <br />