Laserfiche WebLink
� � <br /> FILE#06-3184 , <br /> 10 May 11,2006 � <br /> . Page 4 of 4 <br /> standards, as it will be difficult to aclueve 25% on this 60' lakeshore lot witllout reducing � <br /> the house/garage footprint down to 1,200 s.f.—assutning the rniniinum required driveway " <br /> and sidewalk widths and a modest cleck. Staff would reason that the overall footprint of ,. <br /> the honie is below the 15% structural liinit and results in a more T•easonable level of 75' — ; <br /> 250' hardcover. ' <br /> Issues for Consideration i <br /> 1. Other than the City Engineer's issues are there aiiy other issues or concerns with tlus � <br /> application? <br /> 2. The applicant wanted to include a small turiiaroLUid near the house, but omitted it r <br /> froin his plans in the hope of lessenuzg hardcover. What is the Planning <br /> Conunission's feeling on includinb a small turnaround on site? Topography may f--� <br /> make backing out difficult. � . <br /> Staff Recommendation �-, <br /> Planning Staff recomnzends approval of the lot width and lot area variances, and some 4 � <br /> . level of hardcover variance witlun tlie 75' — 250' zone as the Planning Commission � <br /> deternunes appropriate. The applicants should assure that the proposed home meet the <br /> City's height lunit of 30' and 2.5 stories. Additionally, staff would add a condition that � ; <br /> the property ov�iers comply with the City Engineer's recomrnendations. <br /> � ., <br /> � �....,. <br /> - t , <br /> i_; <br /> i . <br /> � . � ., <br /> �.; <br /> f <br /> � <br /> � ; <br /> � <br /> � <br /> � . <br /> � <br /> �., <br /> � <br /> , <br /> �.. <br /> . . . , <br /> . ; <br /> �.; <br /> , <br /> ` �L �.�..,. .4•„- ;p ` '_,. <br /> ';,' .. a : ,`::"``; _ '�:�' 4 <br /> r ; S; '=_ ,q... <br /> C�•r .�wa �ur � <br />