Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING CONIlVIISSION <br /> Monday,July 17,2006 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. " <br /> (#06-3217 Aulik Design Group, Continued) <br /> • Curtis stated the applicants could provide a minimal driveway,with some parlcing space. Curtis noted <br /> there is no parking available on Ferndale. Curtis stated she does not feel the hardcover could be reduced <br /> to 25 percent in the 75-250 foot zone considering the overages in the 0-75 foot zone. <br /> Bremer recommended the lean-to be removed,with a minimal driveway. Bremer stated the boulder <br /> edg-ing could also be removed. <br /> Curtis recommended all nonessential hardcover be removed within the 0-75 foot zone. <br /> Bremer moved,Kempf seconded,to recommend approval of Application#06-3217,Aulik Design <br /> Group on behalf of Tracy Constable,865 Ferndale Road West,granting of a lakeshore and side <br /> setback variances subject to the removal of all nonessential hardcover in the 0-75 foot zone, <br /> removal of excess hardcover in the 75-250' zone but to allow a minimal size driveway,and further <br /> subject to the removal of the lean-to and any other nonessential hardcover located within the <br /> 75-250 foot zone. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br /> *13. #06-3218 BRIAN ARNE AND JULIE MORRISON-ARNE,KERRY AND HIANN <br /> NASSAUER, 130 AND 145 MANOR CIRCLE,LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT AND <br /> VACATION <br /> Bremer moved,Kroeger seconded,to recommend approval of Application#06-3218,Brian Arne <br /> and Julie Morrison-Arne,Kerry and Kiann Nassauer, 130 and 145 Manor Circle,Lot Line <br /> Rearrangement and Vacation. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br /> 14. #06-3219 HARRIET AND EDSON SPENCER, 1135 SPRING HII,L ROAD, <br /> SUBDIVISION, 10:15 P.M.- 10:42 P.M. <br /> Edson Spencer,Applicant,Robert Fullerton, and�Bridget Hust,Attorney-at-Law,were present. <br /> Turner stated the applicants are requesting approval of a plat to create a second building site. <br /> Turner requested the Planning Commission consider whether an outlot should be created at this time. The <br /> existing private road is within an easement rather than a separate outlot. Staff suggests access for the new <br /> house be from Spring Hill Road,utilizing the existing driveway approach. This would eliminate the need <br /> to run the driveway up the wooded slope. The applicants rejected this option because they have a � <br /> purchase agreement for Lot 2 as proposed and it would disturb too much of Lot 2 to create an outlot <br /> corridor. <br /> PAGE 32 <br />