Laserfiche WebLink
#06-3225 875 VVayznta Boulevard <br /> August 17,2006 <br /> Page 2 <br /> Application St�tus , <br /> . Tlie applicaiit subiiutted the application a.nd application fees on July 24, pursuant to Cotulcil's <br /> • July 10 action to, direct sfiaff to drafl; la�igi.iage to amend the 2000-2020 Orono Conunuiuty <br /> Mauagenlent Plaii (Compreliensive Plan, �aka CMP). That language has been drafted and is <br /> attached as Exhibit F. However, i:he CMP a�nendment could ilot be conditionally approved by <br /> tlie Council on August 14 due to only 3 counciluienlbers beiilg present (Couip P1a.n�anlendments <br /> require a 2/3 vote of a11 councilmembers, i.e. 67% or 4/5). <br /> �ouiicil is e�pected to iake foi7nal action to conditionally adopt the Aineiidmeiit oil August 28 <br /> and duect staff to forward it to nlet Council for approval. Ii: could take some tinie for Met <br /> � Coluicil approval. We also niust account for the 60-day conunent period afforded adjoining <br /> jurisdictions a.nd poteiitially affected agencies (ul tlus case, cities of Long Lake and Wayzata, <br /> MiiDOT, MiiDNR, Heiulepin DOT, Tliree Rivers Parks, Orono Schools, MCWD, etc.). We do <br /> � not know what other related or unrelated requuements Met Council may want to unpose. For <br /> instance, they might not approve the amendment until a foznial sewer aud water agreement with <br /> Long Lake for tlus property is in place. � <br /> It is staff's conclusion that the application is preniature, and that the fornzal review period should <br /> not conunence tuitil the Coinp Plan Aniendnlent is ui place. <br /> . In the meantune, staff is bringing this application forward to Planuing Conmussiou functionally <br /> as a concept plan to allow an opporhuiity to identify poteutial concerns, issues, and developnient <br /> parameters tliat applicant should address. . <br /> Park Commission Review. � . <br /> Park Comnlission was asked to make a recommendation to Council as to whether dedication of <br /> . laud or easements should be required, or merely collec�iou of a park fee. Park Corruuission <br /> Chair I�ene Silber has indicated tl�e Park Commission discussed tlus application during,theu tour <br /> of Big Island on August 7 and is reconuliending that i�.o laiid dedicatioii is necessary, and that a <br /> Park Fee should be required. � <br /> Development Parametei•s per Draft CMP Abaendment <br /> Tlie drafl: CMP auieiidinent is inieilded to apply to just the applica.nt's property and izo others. <br /> The auiei�.dment notes that in addition to the permitted, coi�ditioi�.al aald accessory uses allowed <br /> witl�i.r�. the RR-1B zoiiing dislrict, this aniendmeni allows for residential developmeni: of ihe • <br /> property at a density of 1 iuut per 0.70 dry buildable acres (1.43 tuuts per acre). Ii tlZen goes oii i:o <br /> establish paraineters for aily resideni:ial developuient of the�ropei-ty at a de�lsity greater tliali 0.5 <br /> Luuts per acre of dry buildable la.ild. Those i.ziclude: � <br /> 1. Such developinezit shall be subject to the PUD development process, and shall be rezoned <br /> to RPUD Residex�.tial Plaruled Uiui Developinent. The entire properiy shall be developed � <br /> as a single PUD project. � <br />