Laserfiche WebLink
FILE#06-3206 <br /> June 19,2006 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> Setbacks: <br /> e uired xisting roposed <br /> Street 35 feet 35.5 feet 35.5 feet . <br /> Lake 75 feet 23.1 feet 25 feet <br /> orth Side 10 feet 10.8 feet 5.7 feet <br /> South Side 10 feet 14.1 feet � 14.1 feet <br /> Structural CoveraQe: <br /> llowed xistin ro osed <br /> 2,3�4.75s.f. (15%) 4,370 s.£ (28%) ,219 s.f. (27.1%) <br /> Hardcover Calculations: <br /> Hardcover Zone Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed <br /> Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover <br /> 0—75 g�22g S,f, 0 s.f 3,287s.f.* 2.687 s.f. <br /> (0%) (�9.9%) (32.6%) <br /> 75—250 7,337 s.f. 1,834.25s.f. 3,157s.f.* 3,134 s.f. <br /> (25%) (4�.0%) (42.0%) <br /> * After exclusion of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds <br /> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> Hardship Statement <br /> Applicant has completed the Hardship Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and <br /> should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br /> Hardship Analysis <br /> bz considering applications for variance, tlte Planning Cann2ission shull cotrsider t/te effect of t/te <br /> proposed variance upai tlie/iet�lt/i,safety a�tt!welfare of tlte con:micuity, existi�:g ai:r1 a�rticipate�l traffrc <br /> conditia:s, lig/it an�l air, dm:ger of fire, risk to tlte public s�rfety, u�rd t/re effect o�: valtres of property i�: <br /> tke srrr�oirndi�ig area. T/ie Plafai:ing Conrn:issiort sleall consitler recon:»ie�zdi�rg approva[ for varia�:ces <br /> from tl:e litera!provisions of t/te Zonittg Co�le in instances where their strict enforcement would cause <br /> rrsulire harrls/iip because of circun:stances uniqxe to tlie in�livirlua!property utrder cousideration, �rnd <br /> slial! recontn:end approva/ only wlie�i it is �le�rrorrstrated tleat scrc% rictions will be ir: keepi�rg witlt tlie <br /> spirit�r�t�l i�tterrt of tlte Oro�ro Zol:i�tg Code. <br /> Staff finds that it would be an undue hardship to not allow the flat roof to be replaced <br /> with a pitched roof. The Commission should consider if the applicants have <br /> demonstrated that the second story, which requires more volume be added to the portion <br /> of the structure within the 0-75 foot setback than would be necessary for just a pitched <br /> roof, is necessary to make reasonable use of the property. The plans show that nearly all <br /> the interior walls on the first floor would be removed and replaced at different locations. <br /> The deck, even after the proposed reduction in size, would still measure 18 feet by 36 <br /> feet. This does not include the 7 foot by 36 foot porch adjacent to the deck. This is a <br /> large deck. The deck constructed when the house was built appears to have been smaller. <br /> By reducinQ the deck so the declJporch measures 12 feet by 36 feet the amount of <br />