Laserfiche WebLink
n' <br /> #OS-3161 - <br /> rebrunry 1G,2006 <br /> Page 2 of 2 � ��' <br /> List of Exhibits <br /> Exhibit A—Loucks Letter 2-1-06 <br /> Exhibit B—Revised Plan Set <br /> Sheet C1-l: Existing Conditions Plaai <br /> Sheet C2-1: Preliininary Site Plan <br /> - Sheet C3-l: Preliminary Grading Plan <br /> Sheet C3-2: Storinwater Polhrtion Prevention Pian(SWPP) ' <br /> Sheet C4-l: Preliminary Utility Plan <br /> Sheet C6-1: Preliininary Plat <br /> Sheet C8-1: Project Details . <br /> Ealzibit C—Loucks Transmittal Letters 12-22-05, 1-11-06 _ <br /> Exhibit D—City Engineer Commeiits 12-30-05, 1-6-06, 1-17-06, 1 18 06 : - _ ;� ,.,: <br /> Eahibit E—MCWD Wetland Delineation Approval 11-22-OS `�`�"�`��-=' �"'�� '=���y-� <br /> Exhibit F—PC Action Notice 11-22-OS � -. - <br /> Exhibit G—Draft PC Minutes 11-21-OS <br /> Exhibit H—Memo and Eahibits of 11-17-OS <br /> Ea:hibit I- Site Airphoto . <br /> _ ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION <br /> Park Commission Review Pendin� . . <br /> The CMP indicates a future trail along Noi�th Shore Drive and Shadywood Road. The _ <br /> CMP has not indicated wluch side of the road the trails are planned for but it does <br /> - - indicate the trail would be on the shot�lder or separated. The Park Commission has not <br /> yet reviewed or commented on the proposed plat with relation fo required park dedication <br /> and whether cash and/or land dedication will be required. Land dedication if required � <br /> would likely be a 10' easement along the Shadywood and North Shore Drive frontages. <br /> Such easemeiit would not impact the lot sizes or fiuzctionality because it would be over <br /> the required drainage and utility easements, and dedication of the easement would not <br /> reduce the Pa.rk Dedication Fee whicli would be $11,100.00 in total for the two new back <br /> lots (Lots 1,2 aiid 5 contain or until recently contained existing homes). <br /> Review of Retaiiung Wall Screenin Proposal The applicant has submitted a proposal �� <br /> for screening the retaining wall in Outlot B. See Sheet C8-1 and the February 1^,lettei ,-•;�--� �';� <br /> fionz Loucks. Tlie proposal consistes primarily of use of da.rk color earth#one'"block'and *.������`�` <br /> . .byy i�z fi±�'r_nL. <br /> an ivy pia.nting. Planning Coiruliission should deterinine whether this is acceptable. . 3�' � <br /> -z„��-�'*�- <br /> Staff reconunends approval. Note also that the driveway in Outlot B (Sheet C2-1) has � '�``��' <br /> been slufted to the east to a11ow for a 10' setback, and the one-tier wall at that point will <br /> be 5' from the lot liiie. �� <br /> . . � -Y _�_l _ f . <br /> . . . 1 ' . �'i • <br /> . :�Y" � �F ; Y..- . � 3_•��` 'T' <br /> St�ff Recommendation - �r `�� � - <br /> - . - ._� <br /> , 'c - <br /> Subjecfi to any additional coimnents by the City Engineer, and subject to`Pl�uuiing <br /> Commissioii acceptance of the retaiiiing wall screeiliiig proposal, staff reconunends <br /> granting preliminary plat approval. This item will also be forwarded to the Park <br /> Conunission for conuiient as soon as possible. <br />