My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 2638
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 2600 - 2699 (March 13, 1989 - September 11, 1989)
>
Resolution 2638
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2016 2:03:33 PM
Creation date
7/11/2016 2:03:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City o� ORONO <br /> • . RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � NO. 2638 . <br /> • - • • • <br /> H) The City has asked for increased police supervision <br /> in the area to enforce "no parking" along county road. <br /> 4. The applicant proposes the removal of 6 mature trees as <br /> a result of the expanded parking area within the 0-75' <br /> setback area. Per amended Section 10.22, Subdivision 3, the <br /> � applicant shall apply for a staff permit for tree removal <br /> and in addition submit a planting schedule for the required <br /> replacement trees. <br /> 5. On April 20 , 1989 , the Minnehaha Creek Watershed <br /> District granted a permit that would approve the expansion <br /> of the parking area and the retention pond with treatment <br /> facility for the Minnetonka Boat Works. <br /> 6. Glenn Cook, City Engineer, in a report dated April 12, <br /> � 1989, conceptually approved the proposed drainage plan and <br /> ponding area subject to specific modifications in the <br /> proposed plan. <br /> 7. Wayne A. Matsumoto of the Hennepin County Department of <br /> Public Works, in a report dated May 3, 1989, noted the <br /> following: <br /> A) The County was not aware of an accident problem in <br /> this area and recommended approval of a marked cross- <br /> walk to serve the clients of the marinas. He did not <br /> feel the limited number of accidents within this <br /> section of County Road 15 would warrant the <br /> instal lation of f lashing yel low lights. <br /> B) He added that a pedestrian bridge would appear to <br /> be out of the question because of the limited land area <br /> and land base needed to support the handicapped <br /> requirement. <br /> _ C) He also noted that a walk-way under the Tanager � <br /> Lake Bridge for the clients of the marina may result in <br /> a security risk. <br /> 8. The City Council has considered this application <br /> including the findings of the Planning Commission, reports <br /> • by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of <br /> the proposed variances on the health, safety and 'welfare of <br /> the community. <br /> Page 3 of 8 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.