My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 2637
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Resolution 0001-7547
>
Reso 2600 - 2699 (March 13, 1989 - September 11, 1989)
>
Resolution 2637
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2016 2:00:22 PM
Creation date
7/11/2016 2:00:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Cit� of ORONO <br /> � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � <br /> � N0. 2637 <br /> • - • • <br /> 17. The City Council reviewed the original application on <br /> March 10, 1986, tabling it until April 14, 1986 for final <br /> action. On April 14, 1986, the City Council directed staff <br /> to draft a resolution of denial of variances to al Iow houses <br /> on each of Lots 2 and 3 based on the following findings: <br /> A) The extent of the variances requested is excessive <br /> for the RR-1B zoning district. <br /> B) Given the history of septic system problems in the <br /> City of Orono and surrounding Lake Minnetonka, a <br /> density of three septic systems on 2.9 acres in a <br /> district where 6 acres is required for three septic <br /> systems, is excessive. <br /> C) Because the property is currently used as a <br /> conforming residential building site, the applicant <br /> would not be deprived of a reasonable use of the <br /> • property. <br /> D) Applicant has not demonstrated sufficient hardships <br /> to justify granting of the requested variances. <br /> At the April 14, 1986 Cauncil meeting, the applicant noted <br /> his attorney could not. be present at the meeting. The <br /> applicant was asked if he wished to have the matter tabled <br /> until his attorney was present. Applicant stated that was <br /> not necessary. <br /> 18. After tabling actions with no discussion at the Council <br /> meetings of May 12 and May 27, 1986, due to applicant's <br /> inability to be present, the Council again reviewed this <br /> matter at the June 9, 1986 meeting, with applicant and his <br /> attorney present. The applicant's attorney requested <br /> tabling, and�the matter was tabled. � <br /> 19. In May 1987, the app Iicant again requested the Council <br /> to review this matter. At the regular Orono Council meeting <br /> of May 26, 1987, the applicant was present. The Council <br /> reviewed the original request and was tabled to the June 8, <br /> 1987 meeting. . <br /> 20. At the regular Orono Council meeting of June 8, 1987, <br /> the applicant did not appear and the matter was tabled. <br /> � ' Page 6 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.