Laserfiche WebLink
Cit� o� ORONO � <br /> � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � `:. <br /> � � NO. 2637 <br /> • - • • <br /> Parcel 2 (vacant) <br /> � a) Lot Area Required = 2.0 acres <br /> Existing = 0.85 acres or 42.5� <br /> Variance = 1.15 acres or 57.5� <br /> b) Lot Width Required = 200 feet <br /> . Existing = 159 feet or 79.5� <br /> Variance = 41 feet or 20.5� <br /> Parcel 3 (vacant) <br /> a) Lot Area Required = 2.0 acres <br /> Existing = 1.04 acres or 52$ <br /> Variance = 0.96 acres or 48� <br /> b) Lot Width Required = 200 feet <br /> Existing = 149 feet or 74.5� <br /> • ' Variance = 51 feet or 25.5� <br /> 13. At the April 15, 1985 public hearing, the Planning <br /> Commission gave the applicant the general direction that <br /> the variances proposed were excessive and the Planning <br /> Commission would likely only recommend approval of one new <br /> house, and only if Parcels 2 and 3 were Iegally combined to <br /> create a 1.89 acre building lot. <br /> 14. The zoning appeal was reviewed by the City Council on <br /> May 28 , 1985 , and the Council affirmed staff ' s <br /> interpretation of the zoning code that many variances would <br /> be necessary in order to build on both vacant lots, and at <br /> that meeting certain individual Council members stated they <br /> might consider one additional building site but not two. <br /> - 15. On October 9, 1985, Mr. Ferrell submitted a formal <br /> application for variances to build new homes on Parcels 2 <br /> and 3. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the <br /> ' matter on November l8 , 1985, and tabled the application <br /> pending submittal of additional required survey and soil <br /> testing information for the existing house on Parcel 1. <br /> 16. On February 18, 1986, the Planning Commission again <br /> reviewed the now completed application. The Planning <br /> Commission unanimously recommended denial of two new <br /> � building sites but recommended approval of one new building <br /> site usin,g the combined Parcels 2 and 3, if the applicant <br /> wished to revise his app lication accordingly. <br /> Page 5 of 13 <br />