Laserfiche WebLink
clt� o� oR,oNO � <br /> • I � � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � - NO. 2G37 <br /> ,� � • • <br /> 21. On August 4 , 1988 , applicant submitted a Ietter <br /> requesting a revision of his original application to a11ow <br /> constructian of a new residence on only one of the parcels, <br /> and denying variances for the other parcel. This request <br /> was reviewed by the City Council at their regular meeting of <br /> September 12, 1988 and referred to the Planning Commission <br /> for consideration. <br /> 22. The Planning Commission, at their regular meeting of <br /> October 3, 1988, recommended approval of one additianal <br /> residence, conditioned on that residence being constructed <br /> on a legal combination of the two westerly parcels (Parcels <br /> 2 & 3 ) for a total of 1.89 acres in area for the new <br /> building site. � <br /> 23. , Due to health problems, applicant requested that this <br /> matter not be further reviewed by Council until he could be <br /> present. On Apri1. 10, 1989, applicant requested that the <br /> • item be placed on the Council agenda as soon as possible. <br /> The applicant was notified that the matter would be placed <br /> on the April 24, 1989 Council agenda. At that meeting, the <br /> applicant did not appear. The City Council voted 5-0 to <br /> direct staff to draft a resolution for denial of variances <br /> to build a new residence on either of Parcels 2 and 3. <br /> 24. The applicant maintains that he divided the property in <br /> 1958-59 at the request of then Mayor Herb Ross. The zoning <br /> code in effect at that time did not necessarily limit <br /> development to only one residence per building Iat. Mayor <br /> Ross would not apparently have been legally bound to request <br /> that a division be completed in order to allow the new house <br /> which was permitted in 1958. <br /> 25. The applicant maintains that the property was divided <br /> in a manner such that new homes could be built on each of <br /> Parcels 2 and 3 according to City codes at the time af <br /> division. The exact date of filing of the division has not <br /> been established. If it was priar to October 12, 1959, both <br /> Parcels 2 and 3 would have been conforming lots under the <br /> code in effect at the time. <br /> • Page 7 of 13 <br />